Sunday, February 09, 2014

The United Nations Report on the Vatican’s Role in Global Sex Abuse

This blog has long been a critic of the Roman Catholic Church and the global conspiracy orchestrated from the Vatican to cover up the sexual abuse of likely hundreds of thousands of children and youths by Catholic clergy.  Sadly, to date, neither the Church as an institution nor the hierarchy has been held accountable.  Those who participated in the conspiracy remain for the most part as "princes of the church" given undue deference and respect when many ought to instead be behind bars for a long, long time.  This past week, the United Nations released a report that was nothing less than scathing toward the Vatican.  Andrew Sullivan reacts and makes the case why serious change is needed in the Catholic Church and also why this will be a litmus test for whether or not Pope Francis deserves any respect.  Here are excerpts:
The UN Report on the Vatican’s role as a global conspiracy to enable, abet and cover up crimes against humanity is a vital reminder of just how hideous the Catholic Church has been in violating the souls and bodies of so many innocents. Sometimes, the sheer scale of the abuse renders one mute. But it shouldn’t.

The scale of the criminality is important to keep in mind:
Last month, the Vatican acknowledged that close to 400 priests left the priesthood in 2011 and 2012 because of accusations that they had sexually abused children.
The number of victims is in the tens of thousands. And their agony never ends.
But the institution itself has never held itself fully accountable. And the crimes it presided over were legion and horrifying. Only today, for example, we read of the apology issued by the Legion of Christ – a neo-fascist, theocon cult – for the grotesque abuses of its founder, protected for years by Pope John Paul II:
The Legionaries of Christ, which former members said was run like a secretive cult, accused the founder, the Rev. Marcial Maciel Degollado, who died in 2008, of “reprehensible and objectively immoral behavior” as head of the order from its founding in 1941 until Pope Benedict XVI removed him in 2006.
The Dish’s long coverage of this scandal – well before the hierarchy began finally to take it seriously – can be found here. And when you absorb just how evil this cult was, just how depraved its leader was, and the psychic and spiritual toll it took on so many human beings, you come to one conclusion: there is no way this organization should still exist. The Vatican should shut it down. Period. Instead we have the former cronies and favorites of Maciel still calling the shots.
[W]hy does the church tolerate the continuation of such an organization? And yet it does. Similarly, why on earth is the Pope who presided over the sex abuse crisis – and protected Maciel to his death – even faintly considered for sainthood, far sooner than has ever been the case before? Sanctifying a Pope who presided over such crimes against humanity is an obscenity.

And why do we have to struggle to discover that more than 400 priests have been defrocked because of child rape in the last couple of years alone? Why aren’t their dismissals announced proudly by the Vatican? And why, for Pete’s sake, does the Vatican not enforce a simple rule: all accusations of child abuse should be referred immediately to secular law enforcement?

Francis has an opportunity here – perhaps the only opportunity the church will ever get – to turn a new page, to insist on complete transparency, to be fully accountable to law enforcement, and to atone and recant for the legacy of the past. There needs to be a purge not just of abusing priests but of every church official who played any part in the cover-up. Why, for example, has Cardinal Bernard Law not been defrocked and publicly shamed – instead of enjoying a cushy sinecure in Rome?

The truth is that the Catholic Church has committed a crime against humanity. Until every person implicated in that crime is removed, defrocked and disgraced, the entire moral credibility of the church will remain irreparably damaged.

Andrew's thoughts mirror my own.  Indeed, until the type of purge he describes occurs, I do not see how anyone who is decent and moral can remain an active member of the Church.  To remain a member is to be complicit in the crimes already committed and those likely still occurring.

1 comment:

Bob Felton said...

The number 400 grows even more shocking when you realize that for each of those 400 there were staff, colleagues, even Bishops and Cardinals, who quietly turned a blind eye. This is *exactly* the reason I reject the claim that religion and character have something to do with each other.