If new allegations are true,, it looks like it's not only the powers that be in the Democratic Party of Virginia who are trying to alienate the LGBT vote in the lead up to the 2014 mid-term elections. How else to explain claims that Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz discouraged U.S. House members from pressuring Barack Obama to sign an executive order to ban discrimination against LGBT employees. Currently, in 29 states LGBT workers can be fired at will based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. Having been fired for being gay myself, I know first hand just how devastating this experience can be both emotionally and financially. As to why more LGBT activist haven't spoken out, one need only look at how Equality Virginia handled the controversy over anti-gay marriage DPVA chair Dwight Jones: hand wringing and little else out of fear of losing :access" and "burning bridges" even as LGBT Virginians were thrown under the bus. The
Washington Blade looks at the controversy. Here are excerpts:
A gay Democratic activist claims that Democratic National Committee
Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) has discouraged House members
from asking President Obama to take administrative action to protect
LGBT workers, an assertion her office calls a “bald-faced lie.”
Paul Yandura, political director for gay philanthropist Jonathan
Lewis, made the allegation when speaking with the Washington Blade from
his home in West Virginia on Thursday regarding a 2013 missive that was
circulated among House members by Reps. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) and Lois
Capps (D-Calif.).
“I was told personally by two members that she was tamping down on
public calls for the president to make good on his promise — this was
last year when the issue was really getting hot,” Yandura said. “She is
most likely doing the same still.”
Yandura’s allegation comes as lawmakers — led by the LGBT Equality
Caucus and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) — are circulating a new missive
among members of Congress calling on Obama to sign an executive order
barring federal contractors from engaging in anti-LGBT workplace
discrimination.
Two sources familiar with the 2013 letter told the Washington Blade
that Wasserman Schultz discouraged members of Congress from signing it,
but Yandura was the only source willing to go on the record. The other
source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Wasserman Schultz, who
represents Florida’s 23rd congressional district in the U.S. House,
dissuaded Democrats from signing the letter in private conversations on
the House floor.
“I’m sure she’ll come with something that sounds like a good excuse,
but it’s about time,” Yandura said. “It’s time that she not only signs
it, but tells people that they should publicly, and that it’s OK and
that there’s no pressure not to sign it.”
Mara Sloan, a Wasserman Schultz spokesperson, disputed the
allegations made by Yandura, saying any assertion that she discouraged
members from signing the letter “is a bald-faced lie.”
“The congresswoman believes the most effective way to ensure equal
rights for LGBT Americans in the workplace is through passing
comprehensive non-discrimination legislation,” Sloan said. “The
congresswoman regularly speaks to the administration about issues
important to the LGBT community, and will continue to be a fierce
advocate for full equality.”
Despite her record of support for the LGBT community, Wasserman
Schultz has never explicitly called on Obama to sign an executive order
barring LGBT discrimination among federal contractors. Asked about the
issue in January by
The Huffington Post,
Wasserman Schultz said she supports the idea of Obama using his
executive authority in “as broad a way as he can to ensure that we can
move this country forward.”
Yandura said he thinks Wasserman Schultz refuses to express support
for the executive order and has discouraged House members from speaking
out in favor of it for political reasons.
“I think she doesn’t want to embarrass the president, and still
doesn’t want to embarrass the president, because it is an embarrassment
that he still hasn’t done it,” Yandura said. “We’re now coming down to
the end of the second term, and if they don’t get moving on it, it’ll
never even get implemented.”
Sadly, the take away for LGBT citizens is that we cannot take Democratic Party support for granted. In the final analysis, all they want is our votes and our money and we need to constantly remind them that we attach conditions to both our monetary support and our votes. The Dems cannot take our votes for granted. Of course, if the GOP had any sense, it would kick the Christofascists to the curb and embrace the gays. In close elections, the gay vote does make the difference. Just ask Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring - although he seems to be quickly forgetting that reality notwithstanding his refusal to support Virginia's ban on gay marriage.