With several gay marriage related cases moving up the federal court hierarchy towards the U. S. Supreme Court some have conjectured that Barack Obama's gay marriage announcement yesterday was a way to message - and perhaps influence the Supreme Court justices. Some like Scalia and Thomas will be deaf to the message, however, some others may get it and understand the arch of history that is racing towards them. When Loving v. Virginia was decided, support for racial equality was nowhere near where it is today and the Court's decision helped tip the balance towards acceptance of interracial marriages. Marriages that in no way threatened same race marriages - just as gay marriages in no way threaten straight marriages other than in the minds of Christofascists. A Brookings Institute column looks at the message that Obama may have tried to send to the Court yesterday. Here are highlights:
Count me stunned that President Obama came out in favor of same-sex marriage, after years of straddling and waffling. I was among those who said he would (a) stay on the fence through the election, uncomfortable though that might be, because (b) there's more political downside than upside in bringing the issue forward and taking a stand that still alienates many swing voters. Why, then, did he do it? And what does it mean?
As to why, various press accounts speculate that pressure from gay donors played an important role . . . . To me, those explanations sound unconvincing, or at least incomplete. Gay money knows that the choice between Obama's Democrats and Mitt Romney's Republicans is as stark on gay issues as the divide ever has been. With Republicans in control of the White House and Congress, much of the progress that gay rights made under Obama would be endangered.
Although bringing forward a divisive social issue in an "economy, stupid" year seems unlikely to help either candidate, I suspect that the Romney camp is pretty happy about Obama's announcement. I'd guess that endorsing gay marriage mostly reinforces Obama's appeal to people who were going to vote for him anyway . . . .
If counting electoral votes were all the president was doing, I'd advise him to stay away--against my own convictions as a gay-marriage proponent.
As of his announcement, favoring gay marriage is now fully, indisputably, and permanently a mainstream political position. All hint of weirdness or stigma is gone. It is also now the stated position of one of the two major political parties . . . . Precisely because the issue is unlikely to decide the election this year, November's result will not revoke the issue's promotion in status even if Obama loses. Though gay couples have not achieved full legal equality, gay marriage, as an issue, has achieved full political equality. That is a landmark in the ongoing marriage debate.
The courts, as Obama, the former law professor, must be well aware, will take notice. Two big gay-rights cases--one challenging California's revocation of gay marriage, the other challenging the Defense of Marriage Act--are on their way toward the Supreme Court. With his switch from ambivalence to advocacy, Obama is sending a signal to the courts that the country is ready for gay marriage, giving them more cover to uphold it. Courts may not go by poll results, but they do like to stay within the mainstream. And Obama has just moved it.