
Admittedly, living with Donald Trump, a/k/a Der Trumpenführer, in the White House has caused many Americans to feel as if they are living with a never ending case of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. When in recent decades has one had to worry that the next morning might find them facing a nuclear war started by a petulant, malignant narcissist with the nuclear codes? In my pre-teen years, the threat of a Russian launch nuclear war was a constant, but now the occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue could be the culprit. Because of this non-stop drum beat of stress, some would like to see Trump either, resign, be impeached, or removed pursuant to the 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The down side of that eventuality is that America could be faced with Mike Pence as president. While perhaps not as totally batshit crazy and unstable as Trump, Pence poses a whole different set of dangers to the nation and constitutional government. A very lengthy piece in the
New Yorker looks at the dangers a President Pence would pose, especially given his off the charts religious extremism. In his own way, Pence is just as insane as Trump (here in Virginia, John Adams, the GOP attorney general candidate is a would be Mike Pence clone). Here are lengthy article excerpts which underscore that Pence denies the theory of evolution, denies climate change, is in bed with the Koch brothers, and would inflict his extreme religious beliefs on all Americans:
On September 14th, the right-wing pundit Ann Coulter, who last year
published a book titled “In Trump We Trust,” expressed what a
growing number of Americans, including conservatives, have been feeling since
the 2016 election. . . . She soon added, “If we’re not getting a wall, I’d
prefer President Pence.”
After Trump
threatened to “totally destroy” North Korea, Gail Collins, the Times columnist, praised Vice-President Mike Pence as
someone who at least “seems less
likely to get the planet blown up.” This summer, an opinion
column by Dana Milbank, of the Washington Post,
appeared under the headline “ ‘President Pence’ is
Sounding Better and Better.”
Pence, who has dutifully stood by the President, mustering a
devotional gaze rarely seen since the days of Nancy Reagan, serves as a daily
reminder that the Constitution offers an alternative to Trump. The worse the
President looks, the more desirable his understudy seems. The more Trump is
mired in scandal, the more likely Pence’s elevation to the Oval Office becomes,
unless he ends up legally entangled as well.
If
the job is a gamble for Pence, he himself is something of a gamble for the
country. During the tumultuous 2016 Presidential campaign, relatively little
attention was paid to how Pence was chosen, or to his political record. And,
with all the infighting in the new Administration, few have focussed on Pence’s
power within the White House. Newt Gingrich told
me recently that the three people with the most policy influence in the
Administration are Trump, Chief of Staff John Kelly, and Pence.
Trump
and Pence are misaligned politically, too. Trump campaigned as an unorthodox
outsider, but Pence is a doctrinaire ideologue. Kellyanne Conway, the White
House counsellor, who became a pollster for Pence in 2009, describes him as “a
full-spectrum conservative” on social, moral, economic, and defense issues.
Pence
has taken care to appear extraordinarily loyal to Trump, so much so that Joel
K. Goldstein, a historian and an expert on Vice-Presidents who teaches law at
St. Louis University, refers to him as the “Sycophant-in-Chief.”
This
summer, I visited Pence’s home town of Columbus, Indiana. Harry McCawley, a
retired editor at the Republic, the local newspaper,
told me, “Mike Pence wanted to be President practically since he popped out of
the womb.” Pence exudes a low-key humility, but, McCawley told me, “he’s very
ambitious, even calculating, about the steps he’ll take toward that goal.”
Columbus,
which has a population of forty-five thousand, was dominated by a major engine
manufacturer, Cummins, and escaped the economic woes that afflicted many other
parts of the region. But McCawley, the newspaper editor, told me that, while
Pence was growing up, Columbus, “like many Indiana communities, still had
vestiges of the Ku Klux Klan.” The group had ruled the state’s government in
the twenties, and then gone underground. In Columbus, landlords refused to rent
or sell homes to African-Americans until Cummins’s owners demanded that they do
so.
Mike
Pence attended Hanover College, a liberal-arts school in southeast Indiana. On
a visit home, he told his father that he was thinking of either joining the
priesthood or attending law school. His father suggested he start with law; he
could always join the priesthood later. Shortly thereafter, to his family’s
surprise, Pence became an evangelical Christian. His mother said that “college
gave him a different viewpoint.” The story Pence tells is that he was in a
fraternity, and when he admired another member’s gold cross he was told, “You
have to wear it in your heart before you wear it around your neck.” Soon
afterward, Pence has said, he attended a Christian music festival in Kentucky
and “gave my life to Jesus.”
His
conversion was part of a larger movement. In 1979, during Pence’s junior year
in college, Jerry Falwell founded the Moral Majority, to mobilize Christian
voters as a political force. . . . The Moral Majority’s co-founder, Paul
Weyrich, a Midwestern Catholic, established numerous institutions of the
conservative movement . . . Weyrich condemned homosexuality, feminism,
abortion, and government-imposed racial integration, and he partnered with some
controversial figures, including Laszlo Pasztor, a former member of a pro-Nazi
party in Hungary. When Weyrich died, in 2008, Pence praised him as a “friend
and mentor” and a “founding father of the modern conservative movement,” from
whom he had “benefitted immeasurably.”
While
in law school, at Indiana University, Pence met and married Karen Batten, a
schoolteacher whom he had noticed playing guitar in a church service. . . . Pence’s
friends have called Karen his “prayer warrior.” . . . Pence also began observing
what’s known as the Billy Graham rule, meaning that he never dined alone with
another woman, or attended an event in mixed company where alcohol was served
unless his wife was present. Critics have argued that this approach reduces
women to sexual temptresses and precludes men from working with women on an
equal basis. A Trump campaign official said that he found the Pences’ dynamic
“a little creepy.”
In
a 2008 speech, Pence described himself as “part of what we called the seed corn
Heritage Foundation was spreading around the country in the state think-tank
movement.” It isn’t fully clear whose money was behind the Indiana Policy
Review Foundation, because think tanks, as nonprofits, don’t have to disclose
their donors. But the early funders of the Heritage Foundation included some
Fortune 500 companies, in fields such as oil, chemicals, and tobacco, that
opposed health, safety, and environmental regulations.
Even
as Pence argued for less government interference in business, he pushed for
policies that intruded on people’s private lives. In the early nineties, he
joined the board of the Indiana Family Institute, a far-right group that
supported the criminalization of abortion and campaigned against equal rights
for homosexuals. And, while Pence ran the Indiana Policy Review Foundation, it
published an essay arguing that unmarried women should be denied access to
birth control. . . . Vi Simpson, the former Democratic minority leader of the
Indiana State Senate . . . believes that Pence wants to reverse women’s
economic and political advances. “He’s on a mission,” she said.
In
2000, when a Republican congressman in northern Indiana vacated his seat, Pence
ran as the Party favorite, on a platform that included a promise to oppose “any
effort to recognize homosexuals as a discrete and insular minority entitled to
the protection of anti-discrimination laws.” He won, by a twelve-point margin.
Michael Leppert,
a Democratic lobbyist in Indiana, saw Pence differently. “His politics were
always way outside the mainstream,” Leppert said. “He just does it with a smile
on his face instead of a snarl.” Pence
served twelve years in Congress, but never authored a single successful bill.
His sights, according to Leppert, were always “on the national ticket.”
“He
was as far right as you could go without falling off the earth,” Mike Lofgren,
a former Republican congressional staff member, who has become a Trump critic,
told me. “But he never really put a foot wrong politically. Beneath the
Bible-thumping earnestness was a calculating and ambitious pol.”
Pence
became best known for fiercely opposing abortion. He backed “personhood”
legislation that would ban it under all circumstances, including rape and
incest, unless a woman’s life was at stake. He sponsored an unsuccessful
amendment to the Affordable Care Act that would have made it legal for
government-funded hospitals to turn away a dying woman who needed an abortion.
(Later, as governor of Indiana, he signed a bill barring women from aborting a
physically abnormal fetus; the bill also required fetal burial or cremation,
including after a miscarriage. A federal judge recently found the law unconstitutional.)
Pence,
who had called global warming “a myth” created by environmentalists in their
“latest Chicken Little attempt to raise taxes,” took up the Kochs’ cause. He
not only signed their pledge but urged others to do so as well. He gave
speeches denouncing the cap-and-trade bill—which passed the House but got held
up in the Senate—as a “declaration of war on the Midwest.” His language echoed
that of the Koch groups. . . . the pledge
marked a pivotal turn in the climate-change debate, cementing Republican opposition
to addressing the environmental crisis.
Peterson said that the Checks & Balances Project hadn’t
detected “much money going from the Kochs to Pence before he promoted the ‘No
Climate Tax’ pledge.” Afterward, “he was the Kochs’ guy, and they’ve been
showering him with money ever since.” Peterson went on, “He could see a pathway
to the Presidency with them behind him.”
[I]n
2012, after mulling over his national prospects, Pence ran instead for governor
of Indiana. “The conventional wisdom is that he ran for governor so he could
check that box, get some executive experience, and then run for President,”
Downs said. Pence won the governor’s race, but with only forty-nine per cent of
the vote. “He was scary to the center,” Bill Oesterle, a co-founder of Angie’s
List, an Indiana company that collates user reviews of local contractors, said.
Pence’s
tenure as governor nearly destroyed his political career. He had promised
Oesterle and other members of the state’s Republican business establishment
that he would continue in the path of his predecessor, Mitch Daniels, a
well-liked fiscal conservative who had called for a “truce” on divisive social
issues. “Pence was very accommodating,” Oesterle said. But after he was elected
he began taking controversial far-right stands that, critics believed, were
geared more toward building his national profile than toward serving Indiana
voters.
At
first, Pence highlighted fiscal conservatism. In 2013, he proposed cutting the
state income tax. . . . Eventually, the legislature went along with what Pence
often describes as “the largest income-tax cut in the state’s history,” even
though Indiana already had one of the lowest income taxes in the country, and
had cut it only once before.
In
the spring of 2015, Pence signed a bill called the Religious Freedom
Restoration Act, which he presented as innocuous. “He said it protected
religious freedom, and who’s against that?” Oesterle recalled. But then a
photograph of the closed signing session surfaced. It showed Pence surrounded
by monks and nuns, along with three of the most virulently anti-gay activists
in the state. The image went viral. Indiana residents began examining the law
more closely, and discovered that it essentially legalized discrimination
against homosexuals by businesses in the state.
The outcry over
the Religious Freedom Restoration Act was enormous. Gay-rights groups condemned
the bill and urged boycotts of the state. Pete Buttigieg, the young gay mayor
of South Bend, who is a rising figure in the Democratic Party, told me that he
tried to talk to Pence about the legislation, which he felt would cause major
economic damage to Indiana. “But he got this look in his eye,” Buttigieg
recalled. “He just inhabits a different reality. It’s very difficult for him to
lay aside the social agenda. He’s a zealot.”
In an effort to quell criticism, Pence consented, against the
advice of his staff, to be interviewed by George Stephanopoulos on his
Sunday-morning show on ABC. Stephanopoulos asked him five times if it was now
legal in Indiana for businesses to discriminate against homosexuals, and each
time Pence was evasive. Pence also sidestepped when Stephanopoulos asked him if
he personally supported discrimination against gays. “What killed him was his
unwillingness to take a clear position,” Oesterle said.
Alarmed business
executives from many of the state’s most prominent companies, including
Cummins, Eli Lilly, Salesforce, and Anthem, joined civic leaders in expressing
disapproval. Companies began cancelling conventions, and threatening to reverse
plans to expand in the state. The Indiana business community foresaw millions
of dollars in losses. When the N.C.A.A., which is based in Indianapolis,
declared its opposition to the legislation, the pressure became intolerable.
Even the Republican establishment turned on Pence. A headline in the Star, published the Tuesday after the Stephanopoulos
interview, demanded, “fix this now.”
Within days, the legislature had pushed through a less
discriminatory version of the bill, and Pence signed it, before hastily leaving
town for the weekend. . . . the owner of the Indianapolis Business
Journal, who is a Republican but not a hard-line social conservative,
said, “It just exploded in his face. His polls were terrible. I bet he’d never
get elected again in Indiana. But he went from being a likely loser as an
incumbent governor to Vice-President of the United States. We’re still
reeling!”
Clere, a
Christian who opposes abortion, told me that he now finds Pence’s piety
hypocritical. “He says he’s ‘pro-life,’ ” Clere said. “But people were
dying.” When Clere was asked whom he would rather have as President—Trump or
Pence—he replied, “I’d take Trump every day of the week, and twice on Sunday.”
. . . . He talks all this God stuff, but he’s biased. He hates Muslims, he
hates gay people, and he hates minorities. He didn’t want to be the first white
man in Indiana to pardon an innocent black man.”
Paul Manafort,
who was Trump’s campaign chairman at that point, arranged for Trump to meet
Pence, and urged Trump to pick him. Pence was seen as a bridge to Christian
conservatives, an asset in the Midwest, and a connection to the powerful Koch
network.
Trump began to
appoint an extraordinary number of officials with ties to the Kochs and to
Pence, especially in positions that affected Koch Industries financially, such
as those dealing with regulatory, environmental, and fiscal policy. Short, who
a few months earlier had tried to enlist the Kochs to stop Trump, joined the
White House as its director of legislative affairs. Scott Pruitt, the
militantly anti-regulatory attorney general of Oklahoma, who had been heavily
supported by the Kochs, was appointed director of the Environmental Protection
Agency. Pruitt, in turn, placed Patrick Traylor, a lawyer for Koch Industries
and other fossil-fuel companies, in charge of the E.P.A.’s enforcement of key
anti-pollution laws.
The pattern
continued among lower-level political appointees, including in Pence’s office,
which was stocked with Koch alumni. Pence reportedly consulted with Charles
Koch before hiring his speechwriter, Stephen Ford, who previously worked at
Freedom Partners. . . . Senator Whitehouse, the Rhode Island Democrat, believes that
the Kochs “will stick one hundred of their own people into the government—and
Trump will never notice.”
On November
17th, after little vetting, Flynn was named Trump’s national-security adviser,
one of the most sensitive posts in the U.S. government. There is no indication
that Pence raised any objections about Flynn to Trump, even after
Representative Elijah Cummings, the ranking member on the House Committee on
Oversight and Government Reform, sent Pence a letter warning him about Flynn’s
questionable ethics . . . Pence soon
delivered a series of misleading statements about Flynn.
Several law
professors have argued that the Vice-President could be vulnerable to charges
of obstructing justice, or “misprision of a felony,” for participating in a
meeting about shutting down the federal investigation and then providing a
false cover story to the public. . . . Laurence Tribe, a law professor at
Harvard, tweeted, “The VP appears to me to be in what we lawyers have been
known to call deep doo-doo.”
“Trump thinks
Pence is great,” Bannon told me. But, according to a longtime associate, Trump
also likes to “let Pence know who’s boss.” A staff member from Trump’s campaign
recalls him mocking Pence’s religiosity. He said that, when people met with
Trump after stopping by Pence’s office, Trump would ask them, “Did Mike make you
pray?” Two sources also recalled Trump needling Pence about his views on
abortion and homosexuality. During a meeting with a legal scholar, Trump
belittled Pence’s determination to overturn Roe v. Wade. The legal scholar had
said that, if the Supreme Court did so, many states would likely legalize
abortion on their own. “You see?” Trump asked Pence. “You’ve wasted all this
time and energy on it, and it’s not going to end abortion anyway.” When the
conversation turned to gay rights, Trump motioned toward Pence and joked,
“Don’t ask that guy—he wants to hang them all!”
There have been
other evangelical Christians in the White House, including Carter and George W.
Bush, but Pence’s fundamentalism exceeds theirs. In 2002, he declared that
“educators around America must teach evolution not as fact but as theory,”
alongside such theories as intelligent design . . .
Pence has been
hosting a Bible-study group for Cabinet officers, led by an evangelical pastor
named Ralph Drollinger. In 2004, Drollinger, whose organization, Capitol
Ministries, specializes in proselytizing to elected officials, stirred protests
from female legislators in California, where he was then preaching, after he
wrote, “Women with children at home, who either serve in public office, or are
employed on the outside, pursue a path that contradicts God’s revealed design
for them. It is a sin.” Drollinger describes Catholicism as “a false religion,”
calls homosexuality “a sin,” and believes that a wife must “submit” to her
husband.
Harold Ickes, a
longtime Democratic operative, argues that—putting aside the fear that Trump
might start a nuclear war—“Democrats should hope Trump stays in office,”
because he makes a better foil, and because Pence might work more effectively
with Congress and be more successful at advancing the far right’s agenda.
Both Trump and Pence need to be removed from office. Both are a threat to a majority of Americans, not to mention the rest of the world.