Increasingly, today's Republicans seem to live in a bubble that keeps them from living in the same world as the rest of us. Such is particularly the case in Virginia where the Republican Party of Virginia and GOP members of the General Assembly grovel and do the bidding of Victoria Cobb at The Family Foundation as if she were some sort of controlling dominatrix. As a piece in the
New York Times notes, perhaps such servile behavior and allegiance to some of the most extreme elements in Virginia may be about to bite the Virginia GOP in the ass as their far right batshitery helps elect Tim Kaine and defeat George Allen. What's also telling is that Allen - a former law school classmate of mine - in typical behavior for him hasn't bothered to educate himself as to what some of The Family Foundation backed laws and regulations translate to in reality. Here some highlights from the Times piece:
Last December, toward the end of an early debate between the Senate
candidates in Virginia, George Allen was clearly ill at ease. . . . . Kaine was in the midst of attacking proposed federal legislation of
Allen’s, which declares that life begins at conception. Kaine pointed
out that it would make many forms of contraception illegal:
The way a birth control pill works is often to stop a fertilized egg’s embryo from implanting in a woman’s uterus.
Allen’s “personhood” legislation, Kaine said, would
criminalize
women’s right to make their own reproductive decisions. That is an
intrusive, big government way of coming at a problem that is just
exactly the kind of problem that government really can’t solve and
shouldn’t be trying to solve.
Kaine’s line of argument appeared to catch Allen off guard. . . . . The moderator intervened: “About the contraception question, could you
tell us how do you think birth control pills and intrauterine devices
work?”
Moderator: “Don’t they work by preventing implantation of a fertilized egg?” Allen: “Well, if the egg is not fertilized there is not conception.” Fortunately for Allen, the conversation shifted to other subjects.
In February, the Virginia State Senate passed an informed consent law
requiring that women seeking an abortion first undergo transvaginal
ultrasound, a highly controversial procedure. The reaction in many
quarters of Virginia and in the country at large was voiced in an
editorial in the Norfolk Virginian-Pilot on Feb. 3:
Inserting
something into the vagina of an unwilling woman is a violation in every
sense of the word. But not to a majority of Virginia’s Senate.
“In
a scarcely veiled effort to make abortion impossible,” the newspaper
added, “21 senators used the power of government to do something
grotesque.”
Kaine, a social and cultural liberal, who in almost all public polls
has now taken a modest lead, has benefitted from the actions of the
Republican majority in the both houses of the General Assembly.
They
are not the only Republicans unintentionally helping him. He has also
profited from the behavior of Virginia’s Republican governor, Bob
McDonnell — who was about to sign the transvaginal probe legislation
into law when it blew up into a national issue — and the rulings of
Kenneth Thomas “Ken” Cuccinelli II, the Republican state Attorney
General.
The Senate race here has become a testing ground for how far social
conservatives can push their agenda — and continue to win elections — in
a rapidly changing southern state with a burgeoning population of
college-educated voters as well as many more ethnically diverse voters.
The controversies in Virginia reflect the potentially explosive
political consequences when the more abstract anti-abortion (and
anti-gay marriage) provisions of the 2012 Republican Party platform are
translated into concrete policies at the state and local level. While
Republicans have been successful in recent years across the South,
cultural and demographic trends here in Virginia suggest they may be
pushing the outer limits.
There is a self-evident truth in contemporary politics: any
constituency angered, threatened or fearful of the way the state
exercises power is motivated to turn out to vote. The converse rule is:
voter turnout declines among those groups whose goals and agendas are
protected by those in power. In Virginia, this means that social
liberals are strongly motivated to go to the polls on Nov. 6 to express
their opposition to policies supported by Republican state officials.
If Allen loses, it will be a national setback to the anti-tax wing of
the Republican Party and a defeat for the Christian right. Both groups
will be emboldened if he wins. In other words, the outcome of Kaine vs.
Allen will reverberate far beyond Virginia’s borders.
I sincerely hope George Allen goes down to defeat. He is precisely the type of unthinking puppet to the far right extremists that we do NOT need in the U.S. Senate.