Showing posts with label anti-gay colleges. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti-gay colleges. Show all posts

Sunday, December 06, 2015

Religious Schools Seek Right to Discriminate Against LGBT Students





Even as the far right Christians are calling for a war against all of Islam, these home grown religious extremists are seeking to expand their war on gays on a new front.  They want the right to discriminate against LGBT students and to ignore Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 forbids sex discrimination at any educational institution that receives federal funding.  Stated another way, they want special rights and to place themselves above the law.  As I have said many times, no one is more selfish or self-centered that the self-anointed godly folk.  These folks make the Biblical Pharisees look like Mother Theresa in comparison.  Their effort needs to be defeated and I'd go a step farther: not only yank their federal funding, but take away their tax exempt status on all of the property and income except that directly related to their chapels and worship centers.  Everything else should be taxed (I'd do the same for all church property other than houses of worship themselves).  There is no reason that all citizens are being forced to indirectly underwrite their operations.  I'd even argue that to force the rest of us to do so violates the non-establishment clause of the First Amendment.  A piece in The Advocate looks at this effort for special rights while making the rest of us underwrite it financially through tax exempt status for the haters.  Here are highlights:

With the expansion of LGBT rights, there has been a spike in the number of religiously affiliated colleges and universities seeking exemptions from federal antidiscrimination laws.

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 forbids sex discrimination at any educational institution that receives federal funding, which most do in some form, be it research grants or student financial aid. But it allows any school “controlled by a religious organization” to apply for a waiver from the nondiscrimination requirement if complying with Title IX “would not be consistent with the religious tenets of such organization.”

“These ‘right-to-discriminate’ waivers were relatively rare until the last year,” reports The Column, a Minnesota-based nonprofit LGBT news site, with “a handful” of schools seeking them to avoid putting women in leadership positions. But in 2014, the U.S. Department of Education held that Title IX’s ban on sex discrimination also banned discrimination against transgender and gender-nonconforming people, leading many more schools to apply for waivers. Also, the spread of marriage equality, now nationwide after June’s Supreme Court ruling, has conservative institutions worried they would be required to treat married same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex ones — in access to student housing, for instance.

The schools that have been granted the exemptions include Belmont Abbey College in North Carolina, Franciscan University of Steubenville in Ohio, Judson College in Alabama, East Texas Baptist University, Oklahoma Christian University, Spring Arbor University in Michigan, and Simpson University in California. Those with waivers pending include Biola University in California, Colorado Christian University, Ohio Christian University, and Multnomah University in Portland.

Some schools have sought the waivers so they could bar or expel transgender students, and some have targeted lesbian, gay, and bisexual students and staff as well, reports the site, which obtained the data through a Freedom of Information Act request. Many of them have used a sample policy by the Christian Legal Society. 

“The trend of religiously affiliated, but publicly financed, colleges receiving exemptions from the U.S. Department of Education in order to discriminate against LGBTQ students and employees is disturbing,” attorney Paul Southwick, who has represented students in discrimination suits . . . . we are also seeing the protections of Title IX gutted at the very institutions where students need those protections the most.”

There is recourse, however, Southwick said. He suggested that students or staff who have experienced discrimination file an internal appeal, with the help of a lawyer if possible. “Additionally, students should file a Title IX complaint with the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights,” he said. “This is important and should always be done. Even if their college has a religious exemption from Title IX, the exemption may not apply or it may not stick after being challenged.” 
Religion remains a great evil.

Monday, November 03, 2014

"Christian" Colleges Must Choose Between Bigotry and Public Funds


Freedom of religion was intended by the Founding Fathers was intended to mean that no citizens would be forced to belong to an established church or profess a faith they did not support through forced attendance such as was the norm in colonial Virginia.  One could freely choose one's house of worship.  It was not intended to mean that one could receive public funds and then turn around and discriminate against members of the taxpaying public who did not subscribed to a particular sect's belief system.  Yet that is precisely what a number of so-called Christian colleges - I view them as modern day Pharisee colleges - are seeking to do: receive public funds and grants yet openly discriminate against LGBT students and citizens.  To me, the choice is clear: cease discriminating or give up the public funding.  It's really that simple.  Give up public, taxpayer derived funds and be free to be as bigoted and Pharisaic as one wants.  A piece in the Richmond Times Dispatch looks at the ongoing controversy that will likely ultimately impact a number of gay hating "Christian" colleges and universities in Virginia.  Here are excerpts:
His [Gordon College president D. Michael Lindsay] stand last July came at a cost — to him and the school — that he never anticipated: broken relationships with nearby cities, the loss of a key backer for a federal grant, a review by the regional college accrediting agency, and campus protest and alumni pushback over whether the school should maintain its ban on "homosexual practice" as part of its life and conduct standards.

After coming under fire for its ban on hiring faculty in same-sex relationships, Eastern Mennonite University in Virginia decided this year to delay a decision on whether to uphold the policy, which means it won't be enforced for now. World Vision, a Christian international relief agency based in Washington State, said last March it would hire employees in gay marriages, but quickly backtracked after drawing condemnation from evangelical leaders and losing thousands of donors. At several evangelical colleges, students have formed advocacy groups for gay acceptance, such as OneWheaton, at Wheaton College in Illinois.

Lindsay's support for an exemption from a civil right for gays unleashed long-simmering campus tensions over the school's assertion that it has created a safe place for lesbian and gay students, while maintaining a conduct policy that singles them out.
Mayor Kim Driscoll of Salem responded by ending Gordon's contract to manage the city's Old Town Hall. Salem's Peabody Essex Museum ended its academic relationship with the school and withdrew support for Gordon's grant application to the National Endowment for the Humanities. The New England Association of Schools & Colleges started a review of the controversy.

"He made a mistake in signing it," said James Trent, a sociologist and Gordon professor for 11 years who supports eliminating the ban on "homosexual practice." ''The middle ground begins to wear when you're oppressing people. How do you slightly oppress someone?"
Here in Virginia, Regent University and Liberty University among others need to be forced to decide whether they want public funds or to continue to practice bigotry and discrimination. They are free to decide on the latter, but the cost needs to be that the rest of the taxpaying public is not forced to indirectly subsidize it.   They should not be able to have their cake and eat it too.