
If the 9th Circuit decides that Protect Marriage has standing, the next issue is whether or not Judge Walker's decision declaring that Prop 8 violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the U.S. Constitution should be affirmed. To reverse Judge Walker's ruling, the 9th Circuit must find either (1) that Walker misapplied the law, or (2) that his decision was not supported by the facts presented at trial. On this latter issue, the American Foundation for Equal Rights (AFER) and its legal team of Ted Olson and David Boies offered a great deal of expert and testimony and historical and sociological evidence against Prop 8 at trial. This evidence was left more or less unanswered by Protect Marriage which basically introduced religious belief and religious based bigotry as the main reason to support Prop 8.
Be assured that as soon as the opinion is released and I have time to review it, I will be giving my thoughts on the matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment