Yet another Irish Times op-ed piece is taking the Roman Catholic Church to task on its misplaced priorities which focus on liturgical minutia rather than important issues such as protecting minors from sexual abuse by clergy. The problem seems particularly blatant under the current Pope, Benedict XVI and his less than saintly predecessor, John Paul II who turned a blind eye towards the worldwide abuse problem until it exploded out of control in Boston and now in Ireland. The sad truth is that the Catholic Church hierarchy cares nothing about the Churches members except when it comes to power, control and, of course, money. Indeed, under Benedict XVI, the senior clergy seems increasing out of touch with reality and Benedict scraps the bottom of the barrel to appoint reactionary bishops that seem to think we are still living in the 15th century. Here are some column highlights:
*
“Something seems wrong when the Vatican conducts an apostolic visitation of religious sisters in the United States to make sure they are fully obedient to the Holy See . . . but conducts no visitation of dioceses worldwide to ensure children are safeguarded,” Fr Gerard Moloney has said.
*
Writing in the current issue of the Redemptorist magazine Reality , which he edits, he said: “Something seems wrong when some church people appear more interested in silk robes and the Latin Mass and east-facing altars than in examining why our church has not been a safe environment for its most vulnerable members.”
*
He continued: “Something seems wrong when trying to restore a Tridentine model of church is more important to a small but vociferous minority than building a church where all the baptised feel at home and loved and included and heard and protected.”
*
The abuse scandals had not only “destroyed many innocent lives” but had “also undermined the good work of so many church people at home and throughout the world”, he wrote. A fact “restorationists ignore”, he added, was that “most sex abusers and most bishops and church authorities grew up and were formed in the pre-Vatican II church”. This model of church was one “that had obvious systems failures” and “a theology that kept women and lay men firmly in their place”.
*
What was needed was “not a rigid, defensive, secretive church but an open, transparent, inclusive one where power and decision-making are not the preserve of elderly celibate males but all the baptised”, he said. “Can anyone deny that if priests could marry, if spouses and children lived in presbyteries, if priestly life and family life went together, if this were part of the structure of the church, that it would make for a more healthy system?” he asked.
*
He concluded the litany of abuse and cover-up “must also lead us as a church to examine our attitude to sexuality, the idealisation of virginity, and the insistence on celibacy as a requirement for priesthood”.
*
“Something seems wrong when the Vatican conducts an apostolic visitation of religious sisters in the United States to make sure they are fully obedient to the Holy See . . . but conducts no visitation of dioceses worldwide to ensure children are safeguarded,” Fr Gerard Moloney has said.
*
Writing in the current issue of the Redemptorist magazine Reality , which he edits, he said: “Something seems wrong when some church people appear more interested in silk robes and the Latin Mass and east-facing altars than in examining why our church has not been a safe environment for its most vulnerable members.”
*
He continued: “Something seems wrong when trying to restore a Tridentine model of church is more important to a small but vociferous minority than building a church where all the baptised feel at home and loved and included and heard and protected.”
*
The abuse scandals had not only “destroyed many innocent lives” but had “also undermined the good work of so many church people at home and throughout the world”, he wrote. A fact “restorationists ignore”, he added, was that “most sex abusers and most bishops and church authorities grew up and were formed in the pre-Vatican II church”. This model of church was one “that had obvious systems failures” and “a theology that kept women and lay men firmly in their place”.
*
What was needed was “not a rigid, defensive, secretive church but an open, transparent, inclusive one where power and decision-making are not the preserve of elderly celibate males but all the baptised”, he said. “Can anyone deny that if priests could marry, if spouses and children lived in presbyteries, if priestly life and family life went together, if this were part of the structure of the church, that it would make for a more healthy system?” he asked.
*
He concluded the litany of abuse and cover-up “must also lead us as a church to examine our attitude to sexuality, the idealisation of virginity, and the insistence on celibacy as a requirement for priesthood”.
*
Moloney hits the nail precisely on the head. Today's Church hierarchy and Pope worry about things that have nothing to do with leading a Christian life, but everything to do with grasping for power and control. Indeed, it is precisely the mindset that has driven me from the Catholic Church to a denomination than seems to do a much better job at "getting it" and treating its members with respect and decency.
2 comments:
that is just one of the many things that kept me from church and affiliation with christians for twenty years. this and many other such matters are contained within our true novel Euclid Avenue Our scars mean something. excerpts can be seen in the photo album on facebook-R Keith Rytaran. the press release can be seen at eloquentbooks.com/euclidavenue.html. the book is also available through amazon, barnes & noble, books & co, books-a-million, borders and select hallmark book stores.
"Missplaced prioities" is a real joke to me, being an 80yr.old married 58 yrs(in the church)., and mother of 4, grandmother of 6 and great grandmother of one 3 yr. old.
If you have done any recent research on the Roman Catholic Church ( go to bishopaccountability.org ) you would know that it has nothing to do with "missplaced priorities" but is absolutely "par for the course" for them, since it's beginning in the middle of the first century. That's when St. Paul said it would be "Anathema" if the people listened to anything other than Christ's Words. The Church went haywire then and has been brain washing the people to do "their will" not God's Will, to this very day. If you notice there is nothing biblical about much of anything they did over the millenium that was in His Will. Yet we accepted their BS.
My husband and I left in 2001 when the (Instant Communication)of sexual abuse of children by RC priests, "hit the fan"
Before they[the hierarchy] knew any better, our (Hit and Run, Murderer, Bishop McCarthy, put all the names of AZ.pedophiles in the Az. Republic News Paper.) Five of them came from our small parish of St. Maria Goretti in Scottsdale. We knew them all.Thought they were great.
We were on our boat in San Diego for the summer, when it all came out. Fr. Paul Shanley from Boston was caught molesting a child on a SD school playground where he was authorized by the SDPD to be a school playground attendant that he volunteered for and was gladly accepted by the PD It all came out in the San Diego Paper.
Shanley[was in trouble in Boston for molesting boys who told] so he got away and retired from Boston to the gay community of Hillcrest[suburb of SD] and he and other gays had bought a motel in Palm Springs together and called it the "Boy Man Club". Cool Dude, eh? Shanley is trying to get out of prison right now but has been denied.
Your article is just the tip of the "iceburg". So keep going but don't be an assessory to the Crimes Against Humanity that they are still committing in all areas of evil.
Post a Comment