I frequently take the Log Cabin Republicans ("
LCR") to task for their deranged support of the Republican Party in the face of all the objective evidence that the Party (i) will not ever be changed by their efforts, (ii) has
strayed far from the fiscal policies they claim to support, and (iii) would make many of them potential felons again by re-enacting the sodomy laws. I do not know where many of the yahoos in the
LCR live, but let me assure you that here in Virginia every gay was subject to potential arrest and a felony prosecution up until the decision in
Lawrence v. Texas. Does anyone want to return to that scary status? Apparently some in the
LCR do because they support John McCain who has pledged to appoint Supreme Court justice of a mindset that would overturn Lawrence v. Texas (and many other important decisions). For the life of me, I cannot understand the LCR. Are they just plain stupid or self-hating and seeking punishment for being gay?
365gay.com has a
column that looks at this idiocy on the part of the
LRC. Here are some highlights:
*
I’m confused by Log Cabin Republicans. I see their booths at gay events, I even became friends with one or two in law school, but still, the idea of voting for a party that works against your equal rights amazed me.
*
The next election may choose four years of economic and social policy, but it will also make one other important choice that will affect the rights of gays and lesbians for at least three generations to come: Supreme Court appointments. Today, the Court has four liberal justices, Ginsburg, Stevens, Souter and Breyer. And four conservative appointments who tow the party line, Alito, Roberts, Scalia and Thomas. Kennedy, a conservative appointment who waffles, has often been the necessary vote to tip the balance in the liberals’ favor. *
He was in the most recent Roe v. Wade challenge and again in Lawrence v. Texas. This is important to understand, Lawrence v. Texas is the same decision that allowed Log Cabin Republicans to have sex at all, legally, in many of their home states. *
If Obama becomes president he would, at least, be able to maintain the status quo, maybe put a woman or two up there, and create a few more years of an even fight for those hoping for progressive judgments. If McCain wins, two conservative appointments would shift the majority, leave us with six conservative votes, and little hope for the rights of gay men to engage in sexual intercourse legally. It’s not just gay men who will suffer.
*
Log Cabin Republicans may advocate gradual legislative change, but when the very act of love that defines your personal identity (and membership in your group, I assume) is threatened, perhaps sacrificing a few years of small government is worth it.
If the CNN exit polls are correct, it looks like James Dobson has a lot of potential attendees for his bogus "cure" program, "Love Won Out" which would be more appropriately "Lies Won Out" or "Self-Delusion Won Out." I truly do not understand the mentality of those LGBT individuals who would vote for someone who opposes every pro-gay piece of legislation in Congress and endorsed anti-gay marriage initiatives in Arizona and California. It takes the concept of "self-hating faggot" to a whole new level. And if this kind of voting reflects a case of wealthy queens worrying about their tax rate, it is beyond sick. I guess they would have worked as kapos for the Nazi regime too.
