Christianist Hyperventilate Over Latest California Supreme Court Ruling

I previously posted about the California Supreme Court ruling that held that doctors could not pick and choose who they will treat based on their alleged religious beliefs. Not surprisingly, The Peter - i.e., Peter Labarbera with whom I have had a number of confrontations on his false anti-gay rhetoric - is absolutely beside himself. The Peter seems to have never had a real job and moves from one made up organization after another to continue his anti-gay jihad (when not doing "under cover" research at gay leather events, that is). His latest organization, Americans for [Un]Truth About Homosexuality, is an example of how LaBarbera has made a bizarre career out of lying about LGBT citizens and trying to shake dollars from the pockets of sheeple. His latest scree exemplifies the Christianist view that only they should have legal rights under the law. If your views and beliefs counter theirs, then you are to forfeit your rights in favor of their theocratic rule. Here are some highlights from his disingenuous rant which could clearly encourage the unbalanced to pursue anti-gay violence:

*

Folks, if California is truly a pacesetter for the nation, then America is in big trouble. How ironic that pro-homosexual so-called “nondiscrimination” laws are the new tool for activist-minded judges and liberal legislators to DISCRIMINATE against people of faith. This astonishing 7-0 California Supreme Court decision is further proof that homosexual agenda laws — which create newfangled “rights” based on deviant sexual and gender preferences — are incompatible with our cherished, historic American liberties. . .

*

The “gay” movement is in the vanguard of destroying religious freedom in this nation — even as “queer” activists (and their attorneys) continue to play the victim card. Homosexual “Rights” vs. Religious Freedom is a zero-sum game: when “gay” lawyers win, as in this case, look for freedom to lose. What further proof do we need that “rights” based on sexual perversion are themselves a perversion of genuine civil rights?

*

The lesson for pro-family advocates and lovers of liberty is clear: in states where there are no ’sexual orientation’ laws, they must never be passed. In states where pro-homosexual laws are on the books, they must be repealed to preserve freedom.

*

I find it very disturbing that rather than get the much needed therapy he requires to find self-acceptance and to resolve his intense self-hate over his suppressed desire to suck cock, The Peter continues to spread anti-gay hate against law abiding LGBT citizens who merely seek equality under the laws. NOTE: If my comments seem extreme it is because The Peter repeatedly knowingly puts out false information, pretends he did know it was false when confronted, and then does it all over again in his pursuit of money and influence.