Showing posts with label fundamentalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fundamentalism. Show all posts

Thursday, July 07, 2011

The Three Fundamentalisms of the American Far Right

A column in Salon follows the evolution of the far right in America from the post WWII years through today analyzes how we've come to such batshit craziness and irrationality which has now taken over the Republican Party for the most part. The irony in the piece is that it looks at the evolution - using a concept that much of the far right refuses to believe in despite scientific evidence to support evolution. But then, that's part and parcel with the fundamentalism that has replaced facts and reason. Just look at the GOP Congressional leadership to see how little objective facts and reasoning have evaporated from the scene in the GOP. Much of the drift to irrational insanity not surprisingly flows from the fundamentalism and ignorance by choice of the Christianist faction within the GOP which in my view is like a metastasizing cancer. Here are some highlights:
*
In contradiction to the hostility to Darwinism shared by many of its constituents, the American right is evolving rapidly before our eyes. The project of creating an American version of Burkean conservatism has collapsed. What has replaced it is best described as triple fundamentalism -- a synthesis of Biblical fundamentalism, constitutional fundamentalism and market fundamentalism.
*
Following World War II, the American right was a miscellany of marginal, embittered subcultures -- anti-New Dealers, isolationists, paranoid anticommunists, anti-semites and white supremacists. Russell Kirk and others associated with William F. Buckley Jr.'s National Review sought to Americanize a version of high-toned British Burkean conservatism.
*
The term "fundamentalism" originated in the early twentieth century as a description of reactionary evangelical Protestants in the U.S. who rejected liberal Protestantism and modern evolutionary science and insisted on the inerrancy of the Bible. . . . . once white Southerners captured the Republican party and the conservative movement, the High Church right that found Kirk and Buckley among its college of cardinals gave way to the political equivalent of the Foot-Washin’ Baptists.
*
The increasingly-Southernized American Right has transferred the fundamentalist Protestant mentality from the sphere of religion to the spheres of law and the economy. Protestant fundamentalism is now joined by constitutional fundamentalism and market fundamentalism.
*
In all three cases, the pattern is the same. There is the eternal Truth that never varies -- the will of God, the principles of the Founding Fathers, the so-called laws of the free market. There are the scriptures which explain the eternal truths -- the King James Bible, in the case of religious fundamentalism, the Constitution or the Federalist Papers, in the case of constitutional fundamentalism, and Friedrich von Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom in the case of market fundamentalism . . .
*
History, to the fundamentalist mind, is a story of original perfection, followed by betrayal and restoration. The early Christian church was perfect; it was corrupted and betrayed by medieval Catholicism; and it was restored to its original purity by radical Protestant reformers. In the same way, the American constitution was not a flawed compromise among rival states and factions, to be improved by later amendment, but a document of superhuman wisdom, created in a kind of secular Pentecost at Philadelphia in the summer of 1787.
*
Modern American market fundamentalism, too, is recognizably modeled on the fundamentalist Protestant version of church history . . . . the market fundamentalists pretend that the U.S. was governed by the laws of the market until Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal replaced capitalism with socialism . . .
*
Back when conservatism was orthodox and traditional, rather than fundamentalist and counter-revolutionary, conservatives could engage in friendly debates with liberals, and minds on both sides could now and then be changed. But if your sect alone understands the True Religion and the True Constitution and the Laws of the Market, then there is no point in debate. All those who disagree with you are heretics, to be defeated, whether or not they are converted.
*
The era of triple fundamentalism on the American right is bound to come to an end. Sooner or later, dogmatism and reality will collide, and it is not reality that will crumple like tinfoil. The only question is how much damage will be done to the American polity before the revolution of the saints fizzles out.
*
As I've noted often before, the extreme fundamentalism that we are seeing suggests to me severe emotional and psychological issues on the part of adherents who are absolutely terrified of (i) having to exercise independent thought and analysis and (ii) having their house of cards religious beliefs exposed as lies. This mental illness if you will makes members of the far right perfect victims for demagogues both in the pulpit and in Congress.

Monday, October 06, 2008

The War on Intellectualism

One of the most disturbing thing about fundamentalism and today's Republican Party - especially as embodied by Sarah Palin - is that it revels in ignorance and seeks to belittle and tear down knowledge and intellect whenever and wherever possible. Why? Because only the ignorant and non-thinking will regularly succumb to the Christianist/GOP drivel and slogans. It's a theme that I have touched on many times before when describing the anti-knowledge agenda of the Christian Right and its allies. My blogger friend, Waymon Hudson (pictured at left) at Billerico Project has a post that is very much on target concerning this phenomenon and in keeping with my own views. Here are some highlights:
*
We have heard the some of the buzzwords of this political season- Folksy, Joe Six-pack, Elitist, and Arugula Eating. It seems the new "culture war" or wedge issue is intelligence. The Vice-Presidential debate only solidified the lines in this war. On one side, you had Palin- full of "folksy charm" and "you betcha" language. Then you had Biden, who had a command of the issues, but was called "boring" and (gasp!) "professorial" by the pundits.
*
Is this the point we have come to in our country? Do we really think that having knowledge about an issue is a liability? Have we learned nothing from the past eight years about voting for the person you "want to have a beer with"? Is being smart or intellectually curious a bad thing? It seems the war is on and the Republicans have launched another surge strategy.
*
How is dumbing down our country a breath of fresh air? Lowering the discourse to these levels (Paris Hilton, hockey moms, and lipstick- oh my!) has been staggering and disheartening to watch. The war has not only been waged by promoting the "Joe Six-pack" quality (a term that makes my skin crawl and sounds incredibly offensive) of McCain and Palin, however. They GOP has taken to throwing around charges of elitism, arugula eating, latte and martini drinking to show how Obama and Biden - and by extension all Democrats- are "out of touch" with "real" Americans.
*
How did we get here? I certainly don't want just any old Average Joe to lead our country. I want someone who knows facts and issues. And if they don't know something, I want someone with the intellectual curiosity to learn and find out! Pick up a newspaper, get online, and surround yourself with other intelligent people. Yet McCain can't use the internet and Palin can't name a paper she reads. Where is the intellectualism to be a true leader in this time of trouble in our country?
*
I don't care if politicians don't seem "fun" or "folksy"- I don't want to have a beer with them. I want them to lead. "Going with your gut" is not a viable option for this level of leadership. Quick sound bites or catch phrases don't make you a good leader. I don't care if you can hunt, were in the PTA, or wink at me - I want you to be educated about the issues facing our country.
*
Again, I believe much of the phenomenon that Waymon complains of stems directly from the mind numbing zealotry of the Christianist base of the GOP. These people find glory in their ignorance and hold a truly wretched view of humanity. As Bob Felton at Civil Commotion, their religion is one that debases what it means to be human and dispises intellect:
*
Fundamentalism is so garishly dishonest that it can be difficult to accept how sick and decadent it really is. The religion of love-love-love teaches that all men are born depraved and deserving of death; ‘family values’ demands that the wishes of your Invisible Friend come ahead of your family’s needs; ‘dignity’ is a life spent on your knees, trembling; it claims to cherish life, but teaches that your life is not your own and that the grave is the gateway to joy. It does, indeed, poison everyone it touches.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Saudi Blogger Posts Video On Violent Christian Extremism

I am no friend or supporter of any type of religious extremism. In addition, I believe that Islamic extremists are a very real threat to those in the west who support secular government and freed of religion for all. However, it is ironic to see someone turning the Christianists own tactics against them. Admittedly, he references Dutch filmmaker Geert Wilders' movie "Fitna as what he wants to show as an unfair depiction of Islam, but the Christianist wingnuts are the ones who provided him with the footage to make his film. Raed al-Saeed's film shows that the Christianists' constant anti-Muslim statements and actions DO get noticed overseas and work to create anti-American dislike and hate as a consequence. Not that the Christianists care for anyone but themselves in the final analysis. Raed al-Saeed's comments on the Bible are very much on point and unfortunately the unloving statements from the Christianists show how the Bible is misused daily by extremists to inspire hatred towards those who are different. Here are highlights from Raw Story (http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Saudi_blogger_posts_video_on_violent_0410.html):
A Saudi blogger has made a short video featuring alleged Christian extremists preaching violence and a Bible passage calling for war, in response to an anti-Quran film that sparked protests across the Muslim world.

Raed al-Saeed told The Associated Press on Thursday that the purpose of his six-minute video is to show Islam should not be judged by watching Dutch filmmaker Geert Wilders' movie "Fitna," which links terror attacks by Muslim extremists with texts from the Quran. "It is easy to take parts of any holy book that are out of (context) and make it sound like the most inhumane book ever written," al-Saeed said in a statement posted at the end of his video.
Al-Saeed, 33, said he lifted footage showing alleged Christian extremists and British soldiers beating up Iraqis from YouTube and used the same methods Wilders did. The video appeared to include footage from "Jesus Camp," an American documentary about a summer camp for evangelical Christians that was nominated for a 2007 Academy Award.
Raed's blog (in Arabic) is here. The YouTube video can currently be watched here. RAW STORY has also saved a copy (below) in case YouTube deletes it again.