Showing posts with label Noah's Ark. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Noah's Ark. Show all posts

Monday, April 07, 2014

Christofascists and Noah - A case Study in Batshitery


The "godly folk" never cease to give examples of their lunacy and extreme need to cling to mythical writings found within the Old Testament.  Never mind that the authors of the myths are unknown and had a level of knowledge of science and the universe lower than that of most middle school students nowadays.  Indoctrination - and I believe psychological problems - make it absolutely essential to these folks that nothing be allowed to challenge the fantasy world in which they live.   One of the latest targets of their wrath is the movie Noah which is being condemned for not being sufficiently "biblical."  It goes without saying that most of the hyperventilating "godly folk" do not know that the story of Noah is either (i) a complete myth or (ii) a regurgitation of older flood myths.  A piece in Religion Dispatches looks at the possible real basis for the Noah myth.  Here are excerpts:

Noah did its job. It brought an ancient biblical story about a cataclysmic flood to life for audiences today. Was it biblical? Was it the least biblical Bible movie ever made? These questions flare up in what is frankly a flat and over-rehearsed debate about the Bible in American life. Honestly, does it matter whether a movie is biblical? Do the spiritual-but-not-religious care? Do those evangelicals who grow tired of the stereotype made of them in the media care? Do secular liberals who have no use for the Bible really care about these questions?

Long before the Bible was written, The Flood was a blockbuster of the ancient Mesopotamian and Mediterranean worlds. It originated in Sumer over 4000 years ago. New versions were  deposited in the greatest imperial libraries of the Mesopotamian empires (Babylonia and Assyria). The Biblical authors fashioned their own versions of the tale, and post-biblical authors continued to ruminate on its potential for meaning-making. The Flood found its proper place in Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, and flood stories crop up in Hindu, American Indian, and African story-telling as well.

The first known flood story comes from Sumer in the tale of Atra-hasis (19th century, BCE). This story sets the basic elements of the ancient genre: gods try to eradicate humanity, while a flood hero builds a boat to save the animals. A tragicomedy about polytheism starring petty gods who complain like tired parents annoyed by their noisy children. With plans to destroy a boisterous humanity, they are thwarted not once but three times by the flood hero’s personal god and eminent trickster, Enki. With each divine attempt at total genocide, Enki gives the flood hero secret knowledge about which god to appease with a sacrifice. This worked against the first two rounds of disease and drought. However, Enki had to get creative for the third and final attempt. For the deluge, Enki instructs the flood hero to build a boat for family and fauna.

[T]he Epic of Gilgamesh shines a light on the flood hero’s excruciating experience. Dated somewhere between 1200-900 BCE, the Mesopotamian epic says little about the divine drama. We only hear that “the hearts of the gods were moved to inflict the flood.” The rest of the tale focuses on the flood hero, who builds an ark in a brave abandonment of his wealth: “tear down the house and build a boat; abandon wealth and seek living beings; spurn possessions and keep alive living beings.” He not only rescues his family and the animals from the deluge, he saves his workers, the craftsmen, who helped him build his boat. The moral suppleness of the flood hero crescendos with his first reaction to the post-flood world. Stepping into a sun beam, looking out the window of his ark, he sees that all humanity returned to clay, and with tears streaming down the lines of his face, he slumps down weeping.  

The biblical account owes much to the Gilgamesh version . . . While Islamic tradition focuses on the character of Noah, the Genesis Flood is entirely about God, about a new monotheistic construal of both divine judgment and the pro-human reversal of that judgment. 

The biblical Flood emphasizes the unique role humans played in corrupting the earth. In contrast, the post-biblical tradition of Enochic Judaism lays blame on a human civilization that was corrupted by supernatural forces. Society is shot through with war, industry, and vainglory, all of which were taught by fallen angels.

If the story of Enoch’s Watchers cleanses society, the Hindu flood myth cleanses the mind. The ancient Hindu scriptures emphasize a novel feature of The Flood: enlightenment. In the Mahabharata (and later in the Puranas), the flood hero rides out the deluge in a boat with animals just like Noah.
One has to wonder how many of the cretins and spittle flecked preachers understand that the story of The Flood in the Bible is really just a recycled pagan story.  As noted above, I truly cannot grasp the mindset of these folks who are so terrified of having to think and understand that there is uncertainty in life and in the world that cling to an invisible friend in the sky that, if a creator of the universe exists, bears no resemblance to reality.  Once upon a time such ignorance could be excused given the lack of education and scientific knowledge.  But in today's world this mindset represents nothing less than the deliberate embrace of ignorance.

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Genesis Myth of Noah's Ark Derives from Older Mesopotamian Myth

The brain dead Bible beaters who claim that the Bible is inerrant and literally true just experienced another serious set back.  Already reeling from the human genome project's confirmation that the Adam and Eve of Genius never existed as historical people, new archaeological evidence seems to confirm that the Bible story of Noah's Ark is just a reheated version of a false myth dating from an earlier time in Mesopotamia.  I suspect that as time goes on, more and more scientific knowledge and new archaeological discoveries will further demonstrate that the Bible is anything but literally true much less the "inspired word of God."  Here are highlights from Jerry A. Coyne's blog (he is a Professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Chicago):

We’ve known since at least 1872 that the Great Flood detailed in Genesis is a descendant of earlier flood myths from Mesopotamia.  And there may be some credibility to the presence of at least some serious floods then, based on the fact that Mesopotamia is a giant flood plain and the presence of some archeological evidence for a big flood around 5000 BC. But what we didn’t know until now is that those earlier flood myths also incorporated a boat onto which species of wild animals were sequestered to save them—two by two!  This clearly shows, as if we didn’t know it already, that the Genesis story of Noah and the Ark isn’t true, but was simply an embroidery of earlier flood stories. (It will be interesting to see how Biblical literalists like Ken Ham react to this finding.)

This has all come to light since the recent deciphering of a clay cuneiform tablet first shown to curators at the British Museum in 1985, but not surrendered by its owner for translation until 2009.  Now the remarkable results are detailed in a book by Irving Finkel, Assyriologist and “assistant keeper” of ancient writings at the British Museum.
 [T]he “Ark tablet” . . . . contains 600 cuneiform characters and is dated between 1900 and 1700 BC, which makes it roughly a millennium older than the book of Genesis. According to Finkel, Genesis was assembled between 597 and 538 BC during the Jewish exodus in Babylonia.

Here’s a quick overview of what’s old and new; quotes from the articles are in italics:
  • We’ve known since 1872, from another cuneiform tablet that came to the British Museum, that there were Mesopotamian flood myths that long antedated the one in Genesis. Other tablets surfaced, and their contents are famously detailed in Tablets XI and XII of the Epic of Gilgamesh, written beginning about 2000 BC.
  •  The boat described as the earlier Ark was a huge coracle: a shallow round boat made from coiled ropes of palm fiber. Finkel describes it as being 230 feet in diameter (Chivers’s piece says 70 feet, but he must mean meters, since 70 meters is almost exactly 230 feet). 
[O]f course there’s no way they could have fit the world’s 7-million-plus species (in pairs) on either the Genesis ark or a 230-foot-diameter coracle, so of course literalists have to explain where the later species came from. The usual answer is “evolution” from a limited set of “kinds,” but this disguises the fact that evolution was admitted to occur! So what were taken on the Ark were a set “kinds” that split into all the species we know today.  The fruitless study of what the kinds really comprised is the subject of “baraminology,” which I mentioned above. It’s the world’s most useless (and, to a scientist, funniest) area of scholarly “research.”

The upshot is, of course, that the Ark story is fiction, which won’t surprise any of us. But when I debated those creationists in Arizona a while back, they all held firmly to the literalism of the Ark Story . . . ..

[T]he solution, of course, is to recognize both documents as myths that probably embroidered real-life but smaller floods occurring thousands of years ago in Mesopotamia.

Sunday, January 05, 2014

Planned Creationist "Noah's Ark" Park On Verge of Financial Collapse





I used to do a lot of municipal bond work in my legal practice, so I cannot help but wonder what possessed the local municipality (other than the fact that it is in Arkansas) to issue bonds for such a lunatic project in the first place, but in any event a "Noah's Ark" theme park appears near collapse as 50% of the needed bond issue goes unsold.  The park is yet another creationist effort to pass off Bible myths as fact and it is encouraging to see that institutional investors recognize a bad investment.  Perhaps some of the Christofascist groups will buy up the remaining binds and lose their shirts in the process.  Kentucky.com looks at the impending debacle.  Here are highlights:

A Northern Kentucky theme park to be built around a full-scale replica of Noah's Ark might sink unless investors buy about $29 million in unrated municipal bonds by Feb. 6.

In December, the city of Williamstown issued taxable debt for affiliates of the Christian non-profit Answers in Genesis, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

Even though $26.5 million of securities have been sold, the project needs to sell at least $55 million to avoid triggering a redemption of all the bonds, Ken Ham, the non-profit's president, wrote in an email message Thursday to supporters.  Without the money, construction funding will fall short, he said.

Proceeds are intended to help build a 510-foot, or 300 cubit, wooden ship, the centerpiece of a planned biblical theme park called Ark Encounter.

The project has drawn comparisons to tourist attractions in Alabama and Nebraska that have defaulted, and it comes with the added risk of legal challenges because its religious theme might violate the U.S. Constitution. 

The Washington-based group Americans United for Separation of Church and State said it is monitoring the project.

Industrial-development bonds are considered the riskiest municipal debt because they account for the largest proportion of defaults in the $3.7 trillion municipal market. Williamstown issued the bonds without a rating, making the prospect of repayment even less clear.

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2014/01/03/3016554/noahs-ark-park-in-nky-risks-collapsing.html#storylink=cpy


Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2014/01/03/3016554/noahs-ark-park-in-nky-risks-collapsing.html#storylink=cpy
Ark Encounter has had no institutional investors buy its bonds, Ham said.

The documents cite at least 39 risks to buyers, including that Answers in Genesis has no obligation to back the debt. Bondholders' sole revenue would come from money spent by visitors.

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2014/01/03/3016554/noahs-ark-park-in-nky-risks-collapsing.html#storylink=cpy

Dan Blank and Zach Logan at the underwriter, Ross Sinclaire & Associates, didn't immediately respond to voice mails seeking comment. Joe Boone, vice president of advancement at Answers in Genesis, didn't return calls to his office and mobile phone. 
If they were smart, the underwriters and bond lawyers got their fees paid up front! 

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2014/01/03/3016554/noahs-ark-park-in-nky-risks-collapsing.html#storylink=cpy


Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2014/01/03/3016554/noahs-ark-park-in-nky-risks-collapsing.html#storylink=cpy