New York Times Supports gay Marriage

In an editorial over the weekend, the New York Times editorial board came out in favor of gay marriage in New York State and urged the Republican controlled New York Senate to pass legislation similar to that which has already passed the Democrat controlled Assembly. In the column, the Times directly challenges to Christianist untruth that same sex marriage threatens heterosexual marriage and/or families. Here are some highlights:

*

Gov. David Paterson of New York did the right, fair and legally sound thing this year when he directed state agencies to recognize same-sex marriages performed outside the state. So we were heartened by the recent ruling by a state trial judge that upheld Mr. Paterson’s executive order.

*

Gay couples still may not marry in New York. But the judge’s decision follows a string of rulings that same-sex couples married elsewhere have a right to have their marital status honored in New York.

*

For more than a century, New York has recognized marriage contracts from other states, even if those couples could not legally marry here. Unlike many other states, New York has not enshrined bigotry by prohibiting the state from recognizing same-sex marriages.

*

Marriage is “one of life’s most significant events,” Justice Lucy Billings of State Supreme Court in the Bronx wrote in her ruling, explaining the deeper reason for the state’s recognition rule. And she said that “nothing is more antithetical to family stability” than failing to respect “that solemnized commitment.”

*

New York’s Democratic-controlled Assembly has passed a bill allowing same-sex couples to marry here. New York’s Senate, which has long been under Republican control, must also do the right thing.

New York Executive Order on Gay Marriage Upheld

The legal gadflies at the Christianist fruit farm Alliance Defense Fund have lost yet another court case in their jihad against gays and gay marriage. No doubt the loss will be attributed by the ADF to "activist judges" (or, since the judge was female, an uppity woman who wasn't at home barefoot and pregnant per the Christianists' biblical dictates) rather than legal precedent and case law. Not to mention ADF lawyers who are great at quoting scripture but not so good when it comes to being lawyers. Knowing the ADF, it will likely appeal the ruling and squander more tax payer dollars in its frivolous anti-gay obsessed agenda. Here are some highlights from 365gay.com:

*

(New York City) A New York judge ruled Tuesday that Governor David Paterson (D) did not act illegally when he issued a directive ordering state agencies to recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages. “To recognize same-sex marriages legally solemnized in other jurisdictions is consistent with New York’s common law, statutory law, and constitutional separation of powers,” said the ruling by Justice Lucy Billings in Bronx Supreme Court.

*

NYS attorney’s representing Paterson argued that the governor was within his constitutional rights to issue directives to state agencies over which he has legal authority.

*

Neither the ruling nor Paterson’s directive allowed for same-sex couples to marry in New York. Both were limited to marriages performed only in California and Massachusetts and in countries which have legalized gay marriage.