What Doing the Right Thing Would Be

Obsidian Wings has a great analysis of what Hillary Clinton should be doing given all of the circumstances. Like me the fact that she is not doing them says a lot. Having once run for political office and lost by a razor thin margin - mostly because my opponents was dipicting me as being "Christian Right" of all things - I wonder what those who believed that bull are thinking now. Thus I know that losing hurts and is hard to deal with particularly since there is a feeling of personal rejection. However, the mature and rational thing is to face the reality and get over it. The fact that Hillary will not/cannot speaks volumes and volumes about her character - or lack there of. Here are highlights from Obsidian Wings:

*

I am aware that it must be hard to face the fact that you've lost. But it became clear that she [Hillary] was not going to win the nomination months ago -- I would say after Wisconsin, but certainly after Texas. Moreover, this is not unprecedented. People lose the nomination every four years. Most of the time, they do not stay on until it is mathematically impossible for them to win; they leave when it has become clear that they will not win. They do not complain about disenfranchising all the states with later primaries, they do not threaten to keep their supporters home, and they certainly do not threaten "open civil war" if they don't get nominated for Vice President. On those rare occasions when some candidate does this in the absence of some truly monumental issue, we normally think that that candidate is a narcissistic and unprincipled person who has just shown why s/he should never, ever be President.

*

There is absolutely no reason not to apply these same standards to Hillary Clinton. Right now, instead of floating demands in the press and comparing herself to abolitionists and suffragists, she could be telling her supporters that she lost fair and square; that while there was a lot of sexism in the campaign, there was racism as well, and that sexism does not explain why a candidate with literally every institutional advantage over her opponent lost the nomination. She could be reaching out to the voters who supported her in places where Obama has had trouble, and urging them to vote for him. She could, in a word, be doing the right thing: trying to earn that respect she seems to want.

*
Instead, she's throwing tantrums, making demands that she has no right to make, and threatening civil war.

*
I can't imagine a better demonstration of why she should not be President or Vice President. Nor can I imagine a better demonstration of why some of us who are committed feminists are not happy with her as our standard-bearer. She lost. It happens. If she were an adult or a professional, she would deal with it. Apparently, she is neither.