Thursday, September 04, 2008

Sarah Palin: Underwhelming and a Liar

The boyfriend and I watched most of Sarah Palin's speech last night and, to be fully candid, I don't know where all the GOP representations that she's a fabulous speaker came from. Her delivery was so-so and the substance was certainly lacking when not downright untruthful. Not as bad as the Chimperator, but close in my view. I found the snide remarks made by both Palin and Rudy about "community organizing" little less than non-subtle racist comments. But then, the GOP has become a Christianist/racist party plain and simple. Finally, she made me so nauseated that we turned off the last few minutes. Yahoo News has a good article that looks at Palin's less than honest statements. Of course, Palin was not the only liar of the evening. Here are some highlights:
*
In some cases, the reproach and the praise stretched the truth. Some examples:
*
PALIN: "I have protected the taxpayers by vetoing wasteful spending ... and championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending by Congress. I told the Congress 'thanks but no thanks' for that Bridge to Nowhere."

*
THE FACTS: As mayor of Wasilla, Palin hired a lobbyist and traveled to Washington annually to support earmarks for the town totaling $27 million. In her two years as governor, Alaska has requested nearly $750 million in special federal spending, by far the largest per-capita request in the nation. While Palin notes she rejected plans to build a $398 million bridge from Ketchikan to an island with 50 residents and an airport, that opposition came only after the plan was ridiculed nationally as a "bridge to nowhere."

*
PALIN: "The Democratic nominee for president supports plans to raise income taxes, raise payroll taxes, raise investment income taxes, raise the death tax, raise business taxes, and increase the tax burden on the American people by hundreds of billions of dollars."

*
THE FACTS: The Tax Policy Center, a think tank run jointly by the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, concluded that Obama's plan would increase after-tax income for middle-income taxpayers by about 5 percent by 2012, or nearly $2,200 annually. McCain's plan, which cuts taxes across all income levels, would raise after tax-income for middle-income taxpayers by 3 percent, the center concluded. Obama would provide $80 billion in tax breaks, mainly for poor workers and the elderly, including tripling the Earned Income Tax Credit for minimum-wage workers and higher credits for larger families. He also would raise income taxes, capital gains and dividend taxes on the wealthiest. He would raise payroll taxes on taxpayers with incomes above $250,000, and he would raise corporate taxes. Small businesses that make more than $250,000 a year would see taxes rise.

*
MCCAIN: "She's been governor of our largest state, in charge of 20 percent of America's energy supply ... She's responsible for 20 percent of the nation's energy supply. I'm entertained by the comparison and I hope we can keep making that comparison that running a political campaign is somehow comparable to being the executive of the largest state in America," he said in an interview with ABC News' Charles Gibson.

*
THE FACTS: McCain's phrasing exaggerates both claims. Palin is governor of a state that ranks second nationally in crude oil production, but she's no more "responsible" for that resource than President Bush was when he was governor of Texas, another oil-producing state. In fact, her primary power is the ability to tax oil, which she did in concert with the Alaska Legislature. And where McCain called Alaska the largest state in America, he could as easily have called it the 47th largest state — by population.

*
FORMER MASSACHUSETTS GOV. MITT ROMNEY: "We need change, all right — change from a liberal Washington to a conservative Washington! We have a prescription for every American who wants change in Washington — throw out the big-government liberals, and elect John McCain and Sarah Palin."
*
THE FACTS: A Back-to-the-Future moment. George W. Bush, a conservative Republican, has been president for nearly eight years. And until last year, Republicans controlled Congress. Only since January 2007 have Democrats have been in charge of the House and Senate.

1 comment:

Ramesh said...

Michael:

My sentiments exactly. But it looks to me as if the Republicans could pull "it" off again. I couldn't help thinking that Paulin's speech sounded like a chapter torn from Karl Rove's "Manual of the Politics of Duplicity and Cynicism". I'll bet that, even though she'll be called out on her un-truthfulness and sarcastic manner by the media, she's going to attract a lot of the wavering Democrats and undecided Indpendents (and, of course, the radical religious right wing of the Republican Party).

And why? Just like Bush is "someone you'd like to have a beer with" Paulin is "someone you'd like to have coffee and danish with around the kitchen table".

Scott