
Was Law punished in Rome? Not hardly. He was given a plum position and literally lived as a price in a palace. Would that all of us could be so severely punished. The upside of the scandal was that I realized that there was no reason for me to suffer from religious based guilt for being gay. With Law's retirement from his plum position in Rome, a column in the Boston Herald looks at Law's tawdry legacy. Here are highlights:
So Cardinal Bernard Law goes out, at worst, with but a gentle, subtle push. It’s hardly a satisfying end for the international “poster child for child clergy sex abuse,” as Vatican watcher Peter Borre called Law yesterday.
Law was never indicted. He was never tried. He never had to explain why in the world he wrote glowing letters of recommendation for priests accused of molesting hundreds of children, as he did for Father John Geoghan and Father Paul Shanley.
News flashes yesterday all referred to him as the “disgraced” cardinal. But that disgrace brought him a promotion, not punishment from the Vatican for aiding and abetting such crimes.
Remember how Suffolk Superior Court officials treated Law like royalty when, even as evidence mounted against him, they nonetheless let him and his dark-windowed sedan be whisked inside a garage, then up a back elevator. He never had to face the TV cameras or reporters’ questions.
And most people I’ve asked expect Law to stay in Rome, a city he reportedly adores [and which keeps him outside of the reach of U.S. police authorities]. A month ago I would’ve said well, at least we’ve all learned a lesson. Then Penn State came along.
Catholics who bucked the odds to remain Catholic can separate their faith from the corrupt cabal of cardinals. And many Catholics see justice around the corner as the 80-year-old Law inches ever closer to the ultimate higher authority.
No comments:
Post a Comment