Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Top New York Court Refuses Gay Marriage Case - Allows Recognition of Foreign Marriages to Stand

By refusing to take this case, the New Yourk Court of Appeals (i.e., the supreme court equivalent in New York) has allowed the ruling by an intermediate appellate court to stand, thereby allowing marriages of same-sex couples married in jurisdictions where they are legal to be recognized in New York. The Christianists will no doubt run around saying the sky is falling and alleging that "activist judges" are undermining marriage. However, hopefully, rational voters will quickly see that having gay marriages recognized has not lead to an end of civilization nothwithstanding the mindsets of those like Sally Kern. Here are some story highlights:
*
(New York City) The Court of Appeals, the highest court in New York State, Tuesday declined to hear a case challenging an appeals court ruling that found the marriages of same-sex couples married in jurisdictions where they are legal must be recognized in New York. The decision not to accept the case means the lower court ruling will stand.
*
On February 1 the Appellate Division of state Supreme Court reversed a judge's ruling in 2006 that Monroe Community College did not have to extend health benefits to an employee's lesbian partner. (story) Patricia Martinez, a word processing supervisor, sued the school in 2005, arguing that it granted benefits to heterosexual married couples but denied them to Martinez and her partner, Lisa Ann Golden. The couple formalized their relationship in a civil union ceremony in Vermont in 2001 and were married in Canada in 2004.
*
The college refused to add Golden to the health care benefits because its contract with the Civil Service Employees Association did not address benefits for same-sex partners. Since then, the contract has been enhanced to extend benefits to an employee's domestic partner. State Supreme Court Justice Harold Galloway dismissed Martinez's lawsuit in August 2006, saying that the state does not recognize same-sex marriages. The state legislature ``currently defines marriage as limited to the union of one man and one woman,'' he wrote. The appellate judges disagreed, determining that there is no legal impediment in New York to the recognition of a same-sex marriage.
*
"Until a law is passed by the New York State Legislature, there will always be the possibility that another court decision could undo Martinez v. County of Monroe and strip away from otherwise legally married same-sex couples all of the 1324 state-based rights and responsibilities that come with a marriage license in New York."

No comments: