MAGA Scrambles to Defend Mark Robinson

As a column in the Washington Post notes,  the GOP can’t resist the allure of a Trump-friendly Black conservative - no matter how batshit crazy that supposed conservative my be.  The current glaring example is  the seriously unhinged Mark Robinson, then GOP's gubernatorial candidate in North Carolina. But other examples abound, including Herschel Walker's insane candidacy in Georgia and past nutcases here in Virginia such as "Rev." E. W. Jackson.   The Post column aptly notes:

How did such a person become a GOP rising star and the apple of Trump’s eye? Robinson is not just a MAGA-style conservative. He is also a Black man. This is hardly the first time Trump and the Republican Party have vaulted an inexperienced, unvetted African American into prominence — and then had reason to regret it.

The GOP seems unable to resist the allure of a Trump-friendly Black conservative. Republicans seem to think that the very existence of such individuals rebuts the allegation that the party is, at best, indifferent to the concerns and aspirations of African Americans — or, at worst, simply racist. Robinson is practically from central casting.

Now, with the full extent of Robinson's craziness - and hypocrisy - MAGA Republicans are scrambling to defend Robinson who is lamely trying to claim all of the revelations were AI generated.  Meanwhile, Politico is reporting that Robinson's online activities included additional sites and that much of the usage tracked to an IP address in the area where Robinson lives. It would almost humorous if this was the first time the GOP was sucked in by a Black candidate from whom they should have run screaming.  A piece in The Atlantic looks at MAGA world's gyrations to defend Robinson:

Mark Robinson is pointing a finger at artificial intelligence amid the recent revelations about disturbing comments he allegedly made on a porn site. Robinson, the lieutenant governor of North Carolina who is now the GOP’s gubernatorial nominee, suggested that the comments in which he apparently called himself a “black NAZI,” yearned for the restoration of slavery, and enjoyed reading Mein Kampf could have been artificially generated.

Robinson’s claims of fakery—AI or otherwise—are extremely unlikely. As The Washington Post’s Philip Bump notes, the CNN report linking Robinson to the porn site known as “Nude Africa” was “robust,” exposing “a digital trail that would be all but impossible to create artificially.” And not everyone in the GOP is buying Robinson’s excuse. Much of his senior staff has resigned, and the Trump campaign is reportedly distancing itself from Robinson, although Donald Trump’s endorsement of Robinson still stands.

But the existence of AI aids Robinson in his shoddy defense: Not only can the technology make fake stories believable, but its existence helps those who want to make true stories seem unbelievable. In this election, invoking AI is yet another tool for some Americans to alter facts so that they align with their desired reality. . . . . To be sure, many fake images of politicians—including Donald Trump—proliferate online, some of which use AI, but because this technology sows doubt about reality, it can also provide a convenient dodge for politicians confronted by uncomfortable facts.

Insinuating that AI played a role is just one of the tactics that Robinson and his defenders are using. Others have argued that the allegations are a targeted political attack without identifying exactly how such supposed lies were created. The GOP’s candidate for North Carolina attorney general, Dan Bishop, called the CNN report “a meticulously timed and coordinated character assassination.” The North Carolina Republican Party released a statement hours after the report was published, citing Robinson’s denial and accused “the Left” of “trying to demonize him via personal attacks.”

Others are using vague language to avoid taking a stand. Consider, for example, this tangled double negative from J. D. Vance when he was asked about Robinson’s denial: “I don’t not believe him; I don’t believe him—I just think you have to let these things play out sometimes in the court of public opinion.” Lindsey Graham also toed a careful line, although with clearer language. “The charges are beyond unnerving. If they’re true, he’s unfit to serve for office,” Graham said. But he seemed to leave the door open to the possibility that the story was false.

Then there are those who simply don’t care about the allegations. At a Trump rally in North Carolina over the weekend, The New York Times found that while few in attendance believed the story—many blamed the untrustworthiness of the media, according to the Times—some would support Robinson even if the reports of his racist, anti-Semitic, transphobic, and obscene posts were real. . . . . The calculation was simple, Mr. Faulcon said: policy over character.”

Indeed, if these allegations mattered to [Republican] voters, they would not have nominated Robinson in the first place, would they? This is, after all, someone who called the Holocaust “a bunch of hogwash,” referred to transgenderism and homosexuality as “filth,” and suggested this summer that “some folks need killing.” North Carolina’s GOP voters had ample evidence of who he was, and they chose him anyway. While some of the MAGA faithful have grabbed onto convenient manipulations of the evidence in front of them, these voters’ approach seems to be acceptance.