
*
In her first radio appearance after her veto, Good As You noted that Lingle continued to pretend that the legislation would undermine traditional marriage. She also claimed that if people believe marriage equality for same-sex couples is a “civil rights issue,” they should also be concerned that close relatives can’t marry either:
*
LINGLE: For those people who want to makes this into a civil rights issue, and of course those in favor of the bill, they see it as a civil rights issue. And I understand them drawing that conclusion. But people on the other side would point out, well, we don’t allow other people to marry even — it’s not a civil right for them. First cousins couldn’t marry, or a brother and a sister and that sort of thing. So there are restrictions, not to put it in the exact same category. But the bottom line is, it really can’t be a civil right if we are restricting it in other cases, and it’s been found to be legal in those other cases, that the restrictions
*
Lingle’s argument is popular with conservatives. Recently, former Arkansas governor and current Fox News personality Mike Huckabee said that legalizing marriage equality would “be like saying, well, there are a lot of people who like to use drugs, so let’s go ahead and accommodate those who want who use drugs. There are some people who believe in incest, so we should accommodate them.
1 comment:
What a moron. She sounds like the preacher (can't remember which one) who was upset at billboards advertising underwear which had a man modeling the underwear. I say she's angry at homosexuals for "causing" her to have lesbian thoughts. The closeted ones are usually the most outspoken and hateful.
As for incest, I don't understand how people can even make the comparison to relationships between unrelated people of the same sex. Homosexual relationships are only incest, or even like incest, if both participants are related.
Post a Comment