Racial Resentment - Click image to enlarge |
For many years dating back to Richard Nixon's "Southern Strategy," the Republican Party leadership has utilized and certainly condoned dog whistle racism and bigotry to rally working class whites to support the party even though its economic policies have worsened the plight of poorly educated working class voters. When appeals to racism failed to seal the deal, right wing Christian extremism was similarly nurtured and welcomed by the party elites. Today, the result is an out of control and extremely ugly party base. Now, as a piece in Salon reveals, a survey by the American National Election Studies 2016 Pilot Study, a presidential
primary extension of a long-running election survey, confirms that racism is the driving force behind Donald Trump. Here are article highlights:
What explains the rise of Donald Trump?
There are many potential answers,
but over the course of the campaign two competing theories have emerged. The
first holds that Trump’s message appeals to working-class white voters who’ve
seen their incomes stagnate, manufacturing jobs vanish, and inequality
skyrocket in recent decades. The root cause of Trumpism, in this view, is
economic insecurity. The other, blunter theory is that Trump’s fans flock to
him for the same reason elites view him as an existential threat to American
democracy: His open appeals to racist, white nationalist sentiment.
Both of these theories have some
truth to them. But polling data suggests that racial resentment is the more
important factor.
The poll had a number of questions
designed to measure racial animus.
First, it asked respondents how
important their race is to their identity. Second, it asked respondents whether
they think the words “lazy” and “violent” describe black people, Muslims and
Hispanics, “extremely well,” “very well,” “moderately well,” “slightly well”
and “not well at all.” Finally, it included several questions meant to
measure what scholars refer to as “racial resentment.”
On just about every measure, support for Trump
increased along with the measured racial animus. As the chart below shows,
increased levels of racial stereotyping among white respondents — as measured
by belief that black people, Muslims and Hispanics are “lazy” or “violent”
— strongly increases support for Trump, even after controlling for other
factors. The opposite is true, however, when it comes to support for Marco
Rubio. Among white respondents, support for Rubio decreases with belief in
racial stereotypes. . . . . Trump
support increases significantly among those who describe Muslims as “violent,”
while the same does not hold for the other Republican candidates.
Worryingly for the GOP elite, our analysis also
suggests one reason stopping Trump has proved so difficult: His support is
highest among those who do not follow politics very closely. Support for Trump
in January was strongest among those who said they followed politics “hardly at
all,” while Kasich and Rubio performed best with those who follow politics more
frequently. This means they may have missed, or simply don’t care about, many
of the events (like the recent Chicago protests) that have pushed many away from Trump.
Dating back to Ronald Reagan’s
demonization of “welfare queens,” the GOP has used racially
charged rhetoric to undermine
support for the social safety net. The result has been over time to empower a
demagogue like Donald Trump. A recent New York Times investigation showed that one of the most powerful predictors that a county would vote Trump was its share of citizens living in
mobile homes. In the same investigation, the strongest overall predictor
of support for Trump was not employment rate, but rather the share of
population who were non-Hispanic whites without college degrees.
[W]e find that racism is the main driver of
support for Trump. The model presented here accounts for all of these attitudes
and still finds an incredibly strong relationship between racism and support
for Trump. The centrality of racism to the Trump phenomenon should not be
obscured.
No comments:
Post a Comment