Anti-Gay Diatribe Posted at NBC Affiliate

A reader and fellow blogger tipped me off to this story which involves an anti-gay diatribe posted at NBC affiliate WOAI-TV in San Antonio. The "op-ed" encompasses all of the worse lunacy disseminated by the flat earth folks among the Christian Right - think Elaine Donnelly, Tony Perkins, James Dobson, et al - and in my view makes the case why it is the Christo-fascists, not gays who need to be banned from the military. After all, if one is a member of the military, they are supposed to be supporting the principles of the nation - like equality under the law for all - not some theocratic, Taliban like mentality based on ignorance and religious superstition. I urge all who are offended by this rant to contact WOAI-TV and let the management know your displeasure at the station providing a platform for such bigotry which ought to be confined to some knuckle-dragging church venue. Here are some highlights from the diatribe from WOAI-TV's site:

*

Sodom & Gomorrah, USA Since the 1990s, the so-called gay-rights movement has targeted three of mainstream America’s most revered institutions: the military, of course, but also marriage and—amazingly—the Boy Scouts of America. This relentless campaign is aided and abetted by the Big News Media, especially with regard to the military.

*

The continued high incidence of HIV among gay men—compared to the rest of the American population—is a factor in this military controversy. It’s not “homophobia.” It’s the military’s grim reality of emergency blood transfusions from fellow soldiers, of carnage on battlefields. “Many GIs are fundamentally opposed to the idea [of openly gay troops] especially due to HIV/AIDS, which takes time to appear in lab tests but can infect you upon contact,” a retired non-commissioned officer (NCO) in Army Special Forces remarked.

*

The military’s ongoing prohibition against troops’ openly gay conduct, however, is entirely different. It is appropriate and necessary. The problem is obnoxious behavior that other troops should not have to tolerate on duty or off duty. Moreover, the gay-rights argument that the U.S. military should not discriminate is laughable. . . . there’s also good discrimination that prevents the recruitment—and waste of the military’s time and taxpayers’ money—of young Americans who are physically, mentally, psychologically, and/or behaviorally unfit.

*

Personally, I find the op-ed author, Merrill R. Darby, obnoxious. Does that, therefore, utilizing his logic mean that I get to eliminate some of his rights as a citizen?