Friday, December 07, 2007

Bush losing Support with Military Families

Anyone living in the Hampton Roads area, home of the world's largest naval base and a huge military personnel population, could have come to this conclusion. Military personnel who are sent into harm's way more than anyone are concerned about wars being launched for the right reasons and being properly executed. Since the Chimperator (who made sure he himself avoided any real military duty back in the Vietnam era) lied to get the USA into Iraq and has proved beyond incompetent in managing the war, it is only to be expected that military families are NOT happy as described in this Los Angeles Times story (http://www.latimes.com/news/custom/timespoll/la-na-militpoll7dec07,0,4843202.story?coll=la-home-center). Bush's lies and bungling are literally costing lives, not that he seems to care in the least. Note too how the GOP is losing ground with military voters. Here are some story highlights:


WASHINGTON -- Families with ties to the military, long a reliable source of support for wartime presidents, disapprove of President Bush and his handling of the war in Iraq, with a majority concluding the invasion was not worth it, a Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll has found.The views of the military community, which includes active-duty service members, veterans and their family members, mirror those of the overall adult population, a sign that the strong military endorsement that the administration often pointed to has dwindled in the war's fifth year.



Nearly six out of every 10 military families disapprove of Bush's job performance and the way he has run the war, rating him only slightly better than the general population does.And among those families with soldiers, sailors and Marines who have served in Iraq or Afghanistan, 60% say that the war in Iraq was not worth the cost, the same result as all adults surveyed.


Patience with the war, which has now lasted longer than the U.S. involvement in World War II, is wearing thin -- particularly among families who have sent a service member to the conflict. One-quarter say American troops should stay "as long as it takes to win." Nearly seven in 10 favor a withdrawal within the coming year or "right away."Military families are only slightly more patient: 35% are willing to stay until victory; 58% want the troops home within a year or sooner.Here, too, the military families surveyed are in sync with the general population, 64% of whom call for a withdrawal by the end of next year.

"The man went into Iraq without justification, without a plan; he just decided to go in there and win, and he had no idea what was going to happen," said poll respondent Mary Meneely, 58, of Arco, Minn. Her son, an Air Force reservist, served one tour in Afghanistan. "There have been terrible deaths on our side, and it's even worse for the Iraqi population. It's another Vietnam."


Now the disapproval of Bush appears to have transferred to his party. Republican leanings of military families that began with the Vietnam War -- when Democratic protests seemed to be aimed at the troops as much as the fighting -- have shifted, the poll results show.When military families were asked which party could be trusted to do a better job of handling issues related to them, respondents divided almost evenly: 39% said Democrats and 35% chose Republicans. The general population feels similarly: 39% for Democrats and 31% for Republicans.


"The Democrats are not seen as the anti-soldier group anymore," . . ."We support the troops; we don't support Bush," said respondent Linda Ramirez, 52, of Spooner, Wis., whose 19-year-old son is due to be deployed with the Marines early next year. "These boys have paid a terrible, terrible price."

No comments: