Dobbs Overturned Much More Than Roe v. Wade

With the U.S. Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade through a tortured majority opinion that did legal and historical contortions to achieve the right wing majority's agenda of equal rights only for some citizens, equal access to abortion and in many states reproductive health care across the nation was ended.   States like Texas and Florida - to name but two - have now de facto banned abortion with six week bans that put women in a situation where by the time they know they are pregnant, it is already too late to obtain an abortion regardless of the dire medical need for one that might apply.  Now, Tennessee and Oklahoma want to basically want to restrict women's rights of freedom of travel by proposing felony convictions (with prison time) on anyone who aids a minor in securing an out of state abortion.  It is all part of the larger white Christian nationalists effort to inflict their beliefs on everyone and to again free states to erase nationwide rights within their borders.  Hence the talk of overturning Griswold v. Connecticut which legalized contraception and, of course, Obergefell which legalized same sex marriage.  Also prominent is the effort in red states to restrict voting rights of anyone who might oppose the effort to take the nation backwards in time.  Indeed, the goal is to return to the 1950's, if not the pre-Civil War era when states' rights ranked supreme.  A column in the New York Times looks at the right's agenda:

I want to highlight this report from Jessica Valenti, published in her excellent newsletter, on proposed travel bans for abortion care in Tennessee and Oklahoma. The Tennessee ban, proposed by State Representative Jason Zachary, would make it a felony to take a minor out of state to obtain an abortion. As Valenti notes, “That means a friend, aunt or grandmother who helps a teenager get an abortion could be sent to prison for 15 years.” The Oklahoma bill, if signed into law, would punish anyone who helped a minor obtain abortion care with up to five years in prison.

I have written about how abortion bans implicate a broad set of rights tied to our personal and bodily autonomy, including the right to travel between states. And I have analogized this dynamic to the legal and political conflicts over slavery, which were about not just labor but also the right of free citizens to enjoy the privileges and immunities of U.S. citizenship, wherever in the country they happen to live.

One thing to recognize about the scope of states’ power from the founding to the Civil War is that it was broader and more expansive than we tend to recognize under modern conceptions of constitutional law.  States, as most Americans understood them at the time, were governments of general jurisdiction with far-reaching police powers that gave them almost total discretion to regulate internal affairs. The federal government, by contrast, was a limited government of enumerated powers . . . . .

The police power, the historian Kate Masur notes in “Until Justice Be Done,” “was grounded not in the idea that a government’s duty was to protect individual rights but, rather, in the conviction that government’s most important obligation was to secure the health, safety and general well-being of a community.”

In the slave states, people frequently described as police laws measures designed to prevent slave uprisings and otherwise safeguard the slaveholding order.”

The Civil War and the constitutional amendments that followed brought a fundamental transformation of state and federal power. The states were now subordinate to the federal government in a way that wasn’t true before the war. And state police powers were now bounded by the rights established in the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments. . . . those constituted further restrictions on the police powers of the states. The constitutional right to an abortion, for instance, put real limits on the ability of states to regulate activity within their borders.

Seen in this light, the conservative judicial attack on reproductive rights and voting rights and other breakthroughs of the 1960s and ’70s is about not just those rights but also freeing states to take a heavier hand in regulating their internal affairs.

Let’s look again at Tennessee and Oklahoma. These states (and others, like Texas, Florida and Missouri) are dominated by conservative and reactionary Republican lawmakers who are doing everything in their power to impose traditional patterns of domination under the guise of parents’ rights or family values.

What the Supreme Court is doing — and what it will continue to do — is giving conservative lawmakers the power and license to go further. To take the federal brake off the police power and give state lawmakers the right to do as much as they would like to maintain “public order.”

For as much as it is important to defend reproductive rights — and other key rights — on a state-by-state basis, this is why it is also important to defend and protect them at the level of the federal government. The goal is not just to secure rights but also to restrain the states.

Here in Virginia, with Democrats controlling both houses of the General Assembly, we are safe from these Republican efforts over the next two years.  It will be important to re-elect Democrats in 2025 to restrain these reactionary efforts.