Why Trump Must Be Prosecuted

Some in the news media and, of course, among the multitude of spineless Republicans are wringing their hands and having vapors about a possible criminal prosection of Donald Trump for his coup attempt and effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election.  Of course some of these same members of the media have for years engaged in false equivalency when comparing Democrat positions and Republican lies and played no small part in allowing Donald Trump to be elected in 2016 in the first place.  Now, these faint of heart delicate flowers are whining that prosecuting Trump for his wilful crimes would set a bad precedent and make America akin to a "banana republic."  In reality, failing to prosecute Trump would hasten the decline of America's democracy and edge us ever closer to a banana republic status and/or make America like Putin's Russia where Putin's many crimes go unpunished and merely encourage a further tightening of his dictatorship.  A column in the Washington Post (by a former Republican) makes the case why Trump must be criminally prosecuted.  Here are column highlights:

Nervous pundits warn that for the good of the country, the Justice Department ought not to indict Donald Trump, since prosecuting a former president is the sort of thing “banana republics” do. That’s wrong on two grounds.

First, it is not up to Attorney General Merrick Garland to decide what’s in the country’s long-term democratic interests. The decision to “spare the country” of the turmoil surrounding a past president’s criminal trial rests with the chief executive, as was the case under President Gerald Ford.

The closest the Justice Department’s prosecutorial guidelines come to that concept is the requirement that a prosecution serve a “substantial federal interest.” But that factor, as properly understood, weighs in favor of prosecution. As the guidelines note:

In determining whether a substantial federal interest exists that requires prosecution, the attorney for the government should consider the nature and seriousness of the offense involved. A number of factors may be relevant to this consideration. One factor that is obviously of primary importance is the actual or potential impact of the offense on the community and on the victim(s). The nature and seriousness of the offense may also include a consideration of national security interests.

Well, there could hardly be a more substantial interest than punishing the leader of an attempt to overthrow a democratic election to deter future coups.

Second, prosecuting a former political leader is not what will turn the United States into a “banana republic.” Indeed, I have some unfortunate news for the nervous Nellies: Our country is already on its way to becoming a failed democracy. The question is now what we intend to do about it.

How do you know democracy is unraveling? It is when an incumbent does these sorts of things:

• Refuses to acknowledge he lost an election.
• Uses captive media outlets to undermine the sanctity of elections and lie about election “fraud.”
• Ignores mounds of evidence showing the election was legitimate.
• Attempts to use the Justice Department to throw doubt on the legitimacy of an election.
• Pressures state officials to “find” just enough votes to change the result of a key state.
• Pressures state officials to retract voting certificates and create fraudulent documents to override the will of the people.
• Cooks up a scheme to retain power that his own counsel understands would be illegal.
• Pressures his vice president to disregard his oath and help facilitate the coup plot.
• Calls angry people to show up at the nation’s capital just when the legislature is counting electoral votes and promises the gathering will be “wild!”
• Invites an armed, unhinged mob to march on Congress and promises to join them in confronting the elected leaders carrying out their constitutional duties.
• Incites the crowd to hold his vice president responsible for not having the “courage” to overturn an election, even as the violent mob moves in on him.
• Refuses to use law enforcement or national security personnel to put down his supporters’ violent insurrection.

By now, Americans should realize that this was the stuff of tin-pot dictatorships, not mature constitutional democracies. They should understand that the Republican Party, filled with small individuals hiding behind phony claims of privilege to avoid testifying, has become the bullying apparatus that dictators have historically used to amplify their lies and cloak their actions in legitimacy.

If Americans don’t want our presidents to resemble the thugs of South American or Eastern Europe and don’t want violence to become a standard political weapon, they should demand that Garland keep his word.

This is not the call to “lock him up.” This is the call of a citizenry demanding that the Justice Department follow the legal process to hold responsible anyone involved in arguably the worst crime against democracy in our history. Only a “banana republic” would give the guy behind the coup attempt a get-out-of-jail card.