Sunday, May 30, 2021

The GOP Now Stands for Nothing

Save for six GOP Senators, the Senate Republicans confirmed to the world that they are little more than cheap whores who do Donald Trump's bidding and place avoiding a primary challenge or continued minority status ahead of the interests of the nation and democracy itself.  America's ability to avoid another round of Trumpism and a "Fourth Reich" may now depend on a New York grand jury assembled to consider possible indictments of the Trump Organization and its officers.  Trump, lying as always calls the effort a "witch hunt" but as a column in the Washington Post notes, it is anything but a witch hunt and Trump is terrified indictments may be forthcoming. More on that issue in a moment.  Back to the GOP, a piece in The Atlantic looks at the Senate Republicans' rejection of the rue of law and, I would argue,  basic morality. The self-anointed party of "family values" values nothing but clinging to power and these senators seemingly would sell their mothers into prostitution before they would do anything to affront Der Trumpenfuhrer.  Here are article excerpts:

The Republicans in Congress are blocking a bipartisan investigation into the January 6 insurrection. Their spines crushed by years of obedience to Donald Trump, the members of the GOP have once again retreated from civic responsibility, with one more humiliation of those last few in the party who thought that the Senate Republicans might mimic something like statesmanship.

However, this effort is more than the usual cynical mendacity and crass careerism (or, as one might say, “Elise Stefanik”) that characterize the current Republican Party. This latest insult to the rule of law and the Constitution was possible only because the Republicans have already lost confidence in their own principles. The GOP now stands for nothing. The party of Lincoln has become, in every way, a political and moral nullity.

American conservatism once meant something definite and tangible. You could fight those beliefs and policies; you could argue with them, admire them, or hate them. But they existed. . . . the GOP held clear lines of thought that stood as alternatives to liberalism. . . . . the conservatives moved along broad but common lines. They believed that incrementalism is better than sudden change, that America is exceptional, that patriotism is honorable, and perhaps most important, that government is a necessity to be controlled, rather than a teacher to be revered.

These principles gave the Republican Party several decades of an almost preternatural self-confidence in the eventual triumph of their ideas. . . . . This confidence once attracted young voters (such as me, back in the late 1970s) to the party. The country then seemed to be falling apart—faced with riots, political assassinations, bombings overseas and at home. My colleague David Frum has called the ’70s “strange, feverish years,” a time of “unease and despair, punctuated by disaster.” The liberal Columbia University professor Mark Lilla would later write about how difficult it is “to convey to anyone who wasn’t alive and politically aware at the time what a dreary place America seemed in the late 1970s, how lacking in direction and confidence.”

The Republicans stepped forward in 1980 as optimistic warriors. Joined by some disaffected Democrats, they were certain that they had the intellectual and moral strength to claim victory over domestic chaos and foreign challenges.

The self-assurance of the Republicans who emerged from the post-Watergate wilderness might seem impossible to comprehend now that the modern GOP is rife with know-nothings and apocalyptic hysterics. But their confidence in their own ideas was unassailable—indeed, often to an unhealthy degree.

All of that is gone. Today’s Republicans exist only to stay in power, not least so that their elected officials can avoid what they dread most: being sent home to live among their constituents. The conservative writer George Will is right that the Republican Party in 2021 has become “something new in American history,” a “political party defined by the terror it feels for its own voters.”

Republican legislators should be scared. Their base is an angry white minority that cares nothing about government; its members want their elected officials to rule by hook or by crook, the Constitution and democracy itself be damned, and they don’t want any guff about namby-pamby ideas or policies. They want the elections controlled, the institutions captured, and the libs owned. The rest, to them, is just noise.

The survival instinct that this white-minority rage has triggered in craven Republican politicians is how the GOP mutated from a party championing individual liberty into a movement pushing monstrously statist authoritarianism. It is how the party of limited government began agitating for government truth ministries. It is how the party of exuberant free marketeers became a cabal of crony capitalists and knee-jerk protectionists. It is how the party that once fought Kremlin expansionism provided top cover for Russian intelligence attacks against U.S. institutions.

Republican excuses are little more than lightly veiled defenses of minority rule. The GOP long ago abandoned any effort to convince women, people of color, immigrants, and others that the party had a place for them. Instead, Republicans in Congress have surrendered to the ignorance and racism of their most extreme voters in exchange for a continued life of privilege inside the comforting embrace of the Capital Beltway.

The Republicans, facing an investigation into an insurrection provoked by their own leader, have armored up and gone into armadillo mode. They will protect their own—rather than their nation and the Constitution they swore to defend. This behavior should serve as a warning: A party that doesn’t believe in anything ends up believing only in its right to rule. And a movement that believes only in its own power is a deadly enemy of constitutional democracy.


1 comment:

Terrence X McGovern said...

The fable of 1970s Republicans as loving patriotism, embracing incrementalism, and believing in American exceptionalism, and the Democrats as somehow "revered" government as a teacher is a pile of bunk. I lived through those years, and was even a supporter of Goldwater before that. The party of Reagan loved the outward manifestations of patriotism--flag waving, parade marching, anthem singing, jingoistic "Better dead than red" kind of fervor. They believed America was better than anywhere else, and had nothing to learn from anyone else. That led to their anti-intellectual know-nothing politics. They thought politics was nothing but a tool for making money, and were happy to use big government in the interest of big business. And the Democrats thought government was a good tool for improving the common good.

The rest of what is said is generally correct.