Sunday, March 16, 2014

Obama Administration: Insurers Cannot Discriminate Against Gay Couples


In what is good news for many same sex couples, the Obama administration has issued a directive that insurers are prohibited from discriminating against same-sex marriages for the purposes of non-grandfathered family coverage.  The rule applies even in non-marriage equality states, such as Virginia.  Even with improvements under the Affordable Health Care Act, securing health insurance remains difficult for many and being able to go on one's partner/spouse's coverage is for many the most practical route.  Yet some insurance carriers have baulked at adding partner/spouse to family coverage.  The Washington Blade looks at this welcome development.  Here are highlights:

The Obama administration clarified on Friday that insurers are prohibited from discriminating against same-sex marriages for the purposes of non-grandfathered family coverage — even if applicants are applying in non-marriage equality states.

In guidance dated March 14, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid says existing provisions in the health care reform law prohibiting discrimination by insurers on the basis of gender — which the Obama administration has interpreted to extend non-discrimination protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity — also requires insurers not to refuse family coverage for married same-sex couples.

Alicia Hartinger, a CMS spokesperson, said the guidance spells out that non-discrimination is the rule for insurers — both on and off the health insurance exchanges — when selling policies.

“CMS recognizes the importance of all Americans and their families having access to quality, affordable coverage,” Hartinger said. “Today’s guidance clarifies that issuers may not choose to treat same-sex spouses differently from opposite-sex spouses. If an issuer offers opposite-sex spouse coverage, it may not choose to deny the same coverage to a same-sex spouse. We will continue to work with states and issuers to help ensure all Americans have an equal opportunity to purchase the new coverage options available to them.”

The guidance says insurers cannot refuse family coverage to married same-sex couples even if they live in — or the insurance is sold in — a non-marriage equality state that doesn’t recognize those unions.

LGBT advocates praised the new guidance as a step toward ensuring that married same-sex couples have the same access to health insurance as their opposite-sex counterparts.

There have been reported incidents of married gay couples being unable to receive family coverage in the aftermath of the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. In February, a gay couple — Alfred Cowger and Anthony Wesley of Gates Mills, Ohio — filed a federal lawsuit charging that they were unable to obtain family coverage because their state doesn’t recognize their marriage.

In January, Blue Cross and Blue Shield canceled family insurance policies it sold to same-sex couples under the Affordable Care Act in North Carolina. Following news reports about the cancellations, the insurer changed course and agreed to offer family coverage on the health insurance exchange to same-sex couples.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

I guess my question would be... My marriage was in DC in 2010 to my husband. He is currently employed by the Commonwealth of VA... does the state now have to give him the option of adding me to his health coverage (which would likely be much cheaper than what I am paying now as someone who is self employed)?