|Delcan & Company; Photo by Al Drago/The New York Times|
I and others have been making the case that of the Congressional Republicans perhaps the biggest fraud is Speaker of the House Paul Ryan. His hypocrisy is almost unlimited, especially as he claims to be a dutiful Catholic out of one side of his mouth while at the same time pushing policies that are abhorrent from the perspective of the Catholic Church's social gospel. For far too long, the media has give Ryan a pass on this breath taking hypocrisy. Worse yet, many journalists have acted as if Ryan is a serious thinker and a policy expert. The realty is that these images are empty and unsupported by objective facts. If Ryan is expert at anything, it is at devising ways to take from the poor and middle class while give to the wealthy and then openly lying about the horrific impact of his policies on average Americans. Thankfully, last week's American Health Care Act debacle may finally have the laudatory effect of showing the shallowness and cravenness - I would even argue moral bankruptcy - of Mr. Ryan. A main page editorial in the New York Times does a wonderful take down of Ryan. Here are highlights:
“Look, I’m a policy guy.” That was Paul Ryan’s line before last Friday, when the health care bill he designed in secret went down without a vote, his own party showing what they thought of his policy.
Time and again when he was asked about President Trump’s attacks on immigrants or the courts, his ties to Russia or his claims of massive election fraud, the speaker of the House would say he was too busy working on his agenda, “A Better Way,” to think about all that nasty stuff.
That Mr. Ryan failed on the policy promise that Republicans have been running on for eight years makes it clear that if he is the policy wonk of the Republican Party, then the Republican Party has no policy. And with a health care plan that would have stripped 24 million Americans of basic care and drastically hiked premiums for people over 60, it seems that they don’t much care what Americans need or want.
The discrepancy between promise and reality should be no surprise to anyone who has looked at Mr. Ryan’s proposals over the years. Mr. Ryan has been rolling out grand pronouncements in bound volumes with fancy covers and snappy names, but the main message never changed: America‘s “path to prosperity” (remember that one? 2011) lies in tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations, and slashing social programs and regulations.
Three years ago, a House Republican leader said his report on antipoverty programs showed that “Paul Ryan remains our big-ideas guy.” We called it “a high-minded excuse” to “eviscerate programs like Medicaid, Head Start and food stamps.”
After Mitt Romney, with Mr. Ryan as his running mate, lost the presidential election in 2012, . . . . Mr. Ryan responded by repackaging the same agenda for the 2016 election, even though working-class Americans were demonstrating fury at his establishment orthodoxy. They didn’t want Social Security cut and they wanted the “health care for everybody” that Mr. Trump promised.
After seven years and 60 failed Republican efforts to “repeal and replace” Obamacare, Mr. Ryan finally got his moment, and blew it.
After pulling the bill, Mr. Ryan showed he hadn’t given up on trying to make people think he was someone they could believe in. With no detectable irony, he described his humiliating defeat as “an incredible opportunity,” adding “There remains so much that we can do to help improve people’s lives, and we will.”
But he’s fooling no one any longer. Put to the test, Mr. Ryan revealed that all along, he doesn’t have anything more creative in his cranium than stale conservative dogma.
He had helped fulfill a cynical prophecy delivered last month by John Boehner, . . . . . “In the 25 years that I served in the United States Congress,” Mr. Boehner said, “Republicans never, ever, one time agreed on what a health care proposal should look like. Not once. And all this happy talk that went on in November and December and January about repeal, repeal, repeal — yeah, we’ll do replace, replace — I started laughing.”
We might thank Mr. Ryan for one thing. His dreadful legislation drove voters of both parties to flood town halls and the Capitol, demanding that Congress reject the bill.
One can only hope that going forward, the media will recognize Ryan for the small minded phony that he is and give him media coverage that no longer aids the pretense that the man is a serious thinker.