tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34239589.post2395584313793636124..comments2024-03-27T11:00:44.652-05:00Comments on Michael-In-Norfolk - Coming Out in Mid-Life: Lesbian Gangs Gone WildMichael-in-Norfolkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06330888799107186550noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34239589.post-55191528963662868652007-07-05T14:26:00.000-05:002007-07-05T14:26:00.000-05:00Early and wide reports in Roman antiquity accused ...Early and wide reports in Roman antiquity accused Christians of cannibalism (the Eucharist).<BR/><BR/>O'Reilly several years ago mis-stated five FACTS about the Folsom Street Fair (the "leather," S&M, B&D, crowd), omitting it's 50:50 gay:straight. Beloved's straight brother tries not to miss them, and take family. Beloved and I have never been. All that silly "scene" and "drag" abuse-as-sex nonsense is not "gay" or "straight," it's just how some men and women "get off." Not my way, but hey, if it works, does not harm anyone, well, slave-and-master away with your "secret word."<BR/><BR/>It is curious, however, that no scientist supports "pain is pleasurable." Neither did the ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus. According to our biological (and philosophical) constitutions: Maximize Pleasure, Minimize Pain, is an axiological self-evident first principle. Thus, if "aberrant" is every appropriately used, clearly the "pain-as-pleasure crowd" is an instance, but then most of the PAPC is straight.<BR/><BR/>Let's see if O'Reilly "fairly and balanced" corrects his falsehoods, and reports this story accurately? For all we know, O'Reilly and Murdoch are into the PAPC, as were the Nazis. Throwing Jews into Gas Chambers for pleasure may be "harmful," but then where does one draw the line in PAPC aberrancy? Let's ask the Supreme Court!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com