Thursday, March 02, 2017

Is It Political Suicide for Republicans if They Block a Trump/Russia Investigations?

With news reports seemingly changing by the minute - and not for the better for Der Trumpenführer (who spent the day role playing at Newport News Shipbuilding in nearby Newport News) and his possibly treasonous coquetry of henchmen and stooges - the question becomes one of when does it become political suicide for Republicans to continue to protect Trump and block meaningful investigations into Trump/Russia ties?  The reality is that Republicans have prostituted themselves to Trump out of fear of his ignorance embracing and racist supporters.  Now, it's as if they know that a full, unfettered investigation will reveal what they know in their hearts to be true about Trump and his ties to Russia, and they want to keep the truth bottled up.  The risk, of course, is that if they play this game, European allies may yet provided the smoking gun evidence to take Trump down and fawning Republicans with him.  A column in the Washington Post argues that Republicans are playing a game of Russian roulette (no pun intended).  Here are highlights:
President Trump's Russia problems just got a whole lot worse.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions spoke with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak twice in 2016, according to The Washington Post, conversations that run directly counter to Sessions's assertions during his confirmation hearing to be the nation's top cop.
In that Judiciary Committee hearing Jan. 1o, Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) asked Sessions whether he was aware of any contacts between Trump campaign officials and Russian intelligence officials. “I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians,” Sessions replied.
It does not take a political genius to understand how big a problem this is for Sessions, Trump and congressional Republicans more broadly. (Sessions's response — I talked to a lot people! — isn't going to cut it.)
Before this report, most congressional Republicans were resistant to the idea of appointing a special prosecutor to investigate the contacts between Russia and Trump campaign officials and surrogates — insisting that the ongoing FBI investigation and congressional committees looking into the issue were more than enough.
That's going to become an untenable position for Republicans — starting with House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) — in light of this new information about Sessions. Not only is there a very serious question about whether Sessions misled — purposely or accidentally — his colleagues while under oath, but this is also the latest incident involving unanswered questions about the ties among Trump, his top advisers and Russia.
Former national security adviser Michael Flynn lost his job last month after lying to Vice President Pence — and lots of other people — about the nature of his conversations with Kislyak. Trump has repeatedly refused to condemn Russian President Vladimir Putin while insisting that stories about his ties to Russia are “fake news.”
In short: Where there's smoke and smoke and smoke and smoke and smoke, most reasonable people will assume there is fire — or that there should be an independent investigation to determine whether there is fire. Arguing that “there's nothing to see here” is simply not a tenable position for Republicans at this point.
The details here — particularly given the Flynn resignation — almost certainly will force an act of political triage from GOPers. They need to find a way to wall themselves off from what, with each passing day, is becoming more and more toxic. Otherwise, the spillage could leak all over them.

No comments: